Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
I notice private school parents have all these myths about public school grading. At least in our FCPS schools, the quarter grades are percentages calculated like anything else, there aren't test re-takes unless you fail and you are then limited to a C on the retake even if you score 100 percent. The retake policy is to prevent kids from failing/dropping out of school, not to help those who are gunning for selective schools. Super-scoring is a word for SATs that is open to all private and public schools at the college that accept it. The weighting policy on APs is transparent, reported on school profiles and colleges rescore according to their preferences. Personally I think private schools started dropping APs when parents noticed their kids weren't getting higher exam scores than public school kids and started questioning the value. I went to private schools, I think they offer a great education, but you're really confused if you think public schools have some big advantage in college admissions. Of course you're free to stop paying gazillionK a year and send your kid to one.
Well said. So sick of the private school parents constantly making these false claims about public schools. It just screams insecurity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
I notice private school parents have all these myths about public school grading. At least in our FCPS schools, the quarter grades are percentages calculated like anything else, there aren't test re-takes unless you fail and you are then limited to a C on the retake even if you score 100 percent. The retake policy is to prevent kids from failing/dropping out of school, not to help those who are gunning for selective schools. Super-scoring is a word for SATs that is open to all private and public schools at the college that accept it. The weighting policy on APs is transparent, reported on school profiles and colleges rescore according to their preferences. Personally I think private schools started dropping APs when parents noticed their kids weren't getting higher exam scores than public school kids and started questioning the value. I went to private schools, I think they offer a great education, but you're really confused if you think public schools have some big advantage in college admissions. Of course you're free to stop paying gazillionK a year and send your kid to one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
I think the colleges recalculate the GPA so all the fluff courses get dropped. Band, photography, art history and shop ...all of them are discarded. As for SATs, if you have money to send to Sidwell, then colleges expect that your kid can easily get 1550 in SAT.
Kid is in STEM magnet in MCPS. Probably will get celebrated because of perfect stats and ECs. No hooks thankfully, so will get in because of himself and not because he is Asian-American male.
Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
I notice private school parents have all these myths about public school grading. At least in our FCPS schools, the quarter grades are percentages calculated like anything else, there aren't test re-takes unless you fail and you are then limited to a C on the retake even if you score 100 percent. The retake policy is to prevent kids from failing/dropping out of school, not to help those who are gunning for selective schools. Super-scoring is a word for SATs that is open to all private and public schools at the college that accept it. The weighting policy on APs is transparent, reported on school profiles and colleges rescore according to their preferences. Personally I think private schools started dropping APs when parents noticed their kids weren't getting higher exam scores than public school kids and started questioning the value. I went to private schools, I think they offer a great education, but you're really confused if you think public schools have some big advantage in college admissions. Of course you're free to stop paying gazillionK a year and send your kid to one.
Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Following. Kid is at Sidwell. I’d celebrate kid’s 3.8(uw) all day over a 4.54(w) from Moco or any local public except TJ to demonstrate the actual value-add of HS .... but this does not help at all when top schools over-value those 4.54s.
How does Michigan or UCLA not know that so many 4.7s are the product of unlimited test retakes, super scoring in HS, creatively averaged quarter grades to blur achievement gaps, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tulane, SMU, UMiami, lower-tier NESCACs.
Did I read in this thread or another one - Tulane has an admit rate of ~9.5%. That pretty much rules out the B+ student.
Anonymous wrote:Depends on the HS. Tulane was exactly where several B+ students were accepted from my DS's school. Course rigor matters, as does demonstrated interest.
Anonymous wrote:Tulane, SMU, UMiami, lower-tier NESCACs.
Anonymous wrote:Is the B+ for UW? How does one even determine whether weighted gpa is A or B?