Anonymous
08/01/2021 18:42
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:Why are 49 yr olds having huge birthday bashes like little kids
Especially during a pandemic. She shouldn’t have had the party to begin with
Anonymous
08/01/2021 18:41
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
I had the same thought.
Anonymous
jsteele
08/01/2021 18:04
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Such a d*ck thing to imply. You should be ashamed.
If implying it is so bad, what do you think about the Mayor who actually did it?
Anonymous
08/01/2021 18:02
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Such a d*ck thing to imply. You should be ashamed.
Don’t even need to imply it because it’s so clearly true.
Anonymous
08/01/2021 17:58
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Such a d*ck thing to imply. You should be ashamed.
Hey! I didn’t realize falcicchio read DCUM
Anonymous
08/01/2021 17:56
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Why are 49 yr olds having huge birthday bashes like little kids
Anonymous
08/01/2021 17:51
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Such a d*ck thing to imply. You should be ashamed.
Anonymous
08/01/2021 17:48
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Bingo. It’s amazing how transparent it was. She sucks so badly.
jsteele
08/01/2021 15:22
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:Her mask order was/is the right policy.
1) Cases rising.
2) Unclear to what extent vaccine protects against serious illness with delta variant.
3) If vaccines no longer effective, masking is all we have got. (No one wants to return to lockdowns.)
All good points. The Mayor should pay attention to them herself.
Anonymous
08/01/2021 15:21
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Her mask order was/is the right policy.
1) Cases rising.
2) Unclear to what extent vaccine protects against serious illness with delta variant.
3) If vaccines no longer effective, masking is all we have got. (No one wants to return to lockdowns.)
1) Cases rising.
2) Unclear to what extent vaccine protects against serious illness with delta variant.
3) If vaccines no longer effective, masking is all we have got. (No one wants to return to lockdowns.)
jsteele
08/01/2021 15:20
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
I wonder if she delayed the start of the mask mandate until after her birthday party? When she announced it, I thought it was weird that it was being delayed a few days.
Anonymous
08/01/2021 15:05
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
Isn't there a difference between a private event and a public space?
Not according to her order.
Anonymous
08/01/2021 15:02
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)
Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect
So: hypocrisy in the extreme
Isn't there a difference between a private event and a public space?
Anonymous
08/01/2021 14:55
Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect
"Do as I say, not as I do"