Anonymous wrote:I live near the great lakes and I know at one point they were going to build a pipeline to divert water to the west. I believe it was shot down due to environmental concerns. With climate change while some parts of the country have been dryer many others have had record amounts of rainfall. I think eventually we're going to have water pipelines similar to oil pipelines.
Anonymous wrote:Cities won’t be affected. They’ll stop growing almonds and lettuce.
Anonymous wrote:I live in SoCal & our Governor recently suggested, not mandated that us citizens here should watch our H2O usage.
I remember around five yrs or so ago, we were told to take five min showers + only water our lawns on certain days.
There was even a special enforcement team we jokingly referred to as the “Water Patrol.”
Hoping it doesn’t go back to that again. 😕
Anonymous wrote:I live in SoCal & our Governor recently suggested, not mandated that us citizens here should watch our H2O usage.
I remember around five yrs or so ago, we were told to take five min showers + only water our lawns on certain days.
There was even a special enforcement team we jokingly referred to as the “Water Patrol.”
Hoping it doesn’t go back to that again. 😕
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:California produces 80% of the world's almonds — 2 billion pounds a year — at a staggering cost of 2,000 gallons of water per pound of almonds. Ten percent of California's water is guzzled up by almonds. Almonds have got to go.
But they are the best nut, by far!
Almonds (1900 gallons per pound) use more water than beef (1847 gallons per pound) per pound! If you eat a lot of almonds and drink almond milk, you hate the environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:California produces 80% of the world's almonds — 2 billion pounds a year — at a staggering cost of 2,000 gallons of water per pound of almonds. Ten percent of California's water is guzzled up by almonds. Almonds have got to go.
But they are the best nut, by far!
Anonymous wrote:California produces 80% of the world's almonds — 2 billion pounds a year — at a staggering cost of 2,000 gallons of water per pound of almonds. Ten percent of California's water is guzzled up by almonds. Almonds have got to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People should be more concerned than they are. Water is being diverted from northern to southern CA. Nestle is taking water they shouldn't. The western third of the US is turning into a desert. Fires will keep happening. People know it is bad, think about moving, but don't.
Doesn’t Southern CA get its water from the Colorado River? Which presents its own challenges, but I don’t think NorCal supplies water to southern Ca.
Doesn’t Southern CA get its water from the Colorado River? Which presents its own challenges, but I don’t think NorCal supplies water to southern Ca.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a fascinating subject to me as I grew up in the Bay Area and lived through many years of drought. My mother’s family were almond ranchers in Sonoma county.
Apparently the entire west was built up during an abnormally wet period, during which the forests grew as well. Now drought is reshaping the entire landscape.
When I was a child in the Bay Area the fruit and other farms were right up against the city and fresh produce was everywhere. Then the water and land became too valuable and the farmers sold props and water rights to developers.
Desalination is way too expensive to become a viable option for all but the wealthiest. Here is an article about the Santa Barbara de-sal plant, which can only afford to operate intermittently:
https://www.santabarbaraca.gov/gov/depts/pw/resources/system/sources/desalination/default.asp
I wonder what the effect on crops will be. Think about how many almond products are out there.