Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Do you think DCPS should be ordered to return Trogisch to his job at Walls? That's the correct outcome if he got hosed, right?
Principal contracts are year to year in DC. I think a court would be hard pressed to "order" him reinstated. I do not know what other entity could order it.
I do think he should be paid for the full year and allowed to retire with all benefits as if he was never forced out. I think his record should be wiped clean and I think that DCPS should be liable for some damages for the negative impact on his reputation from their actions.
Well, if he hasn't been able to find another job with comparable pay, he ought to continue to be paid by DCPS until he finds the new job. I don't think anyone could argue that being unjustifiably fired was a damage to his reputation and his resume. I don't know if the law allows a judge to order that he be reinstated, but if DCPS broke his contract by unjustifiably firing him...shouldn't he be able to get his job back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Do you think DCPS should be ordered to return Trogisch to his job at Walls? That's the correct outcome if he got hosed, right?
Principal contracts are year to year in DC. I think a court would be hard pressed to "order" him reinstated. I do not know what other entity could order it.
I do think he should be paid for the full year and allowed to retire with all benefits as if he was never forced out. I think his record should be wiped clean and I think that DCPS should be liable for some damages for the negative impact on his reputation from their actions.
Well, if he hasn't been able to find another job with comparable pay, he ought to continue to be paid by DCPS until he finds the new job. I don't think anyone could argue that being unjustifiably fired was a damage to his reputation and his resume. I don't know if the law allows a judge to order that he be reinstated, but if DCPS broke his contract by unjustifiably firing him...shouldn't he be able to get his job back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Do you think DCPS should be ordered to return Trogisch to his job at Walls? That's the correct outcome if he got hosed, right?
Principal contracts are year to year in DC. I think a court would be hard pressed to "order" him reinstated. I do not know what other entity could order it.
I do think he should be paid for the full year and allowed to retire with all benefits as if he was never forced out. I think his record should be wiped clean and I think that DCPS should be liable for some damages for the negative impact on his reputation from their actions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Do you think DCPS should be ordered to return Trogisch to his job at Walls? That's the correct outcome if he got hosed, right?
Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.
Anonymous wrote:What happened to Trogish was bad, but Ms. Issacs effectively ran the school even before he was let go as I understand it. I am a Walls parent and looking forward to my child being back in school this fall.
They did have the 9th graders in the building doing their distance learning from school. I am not convinced this was significantly worse than the “in person” teaching my Deal student got where she was learning through her computer in the same classroom where her teacher was teaching from the back of the room.
By this spring my 10th grader (now 11th grader) had zero interest in being back in the building before the fall.