Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have narrowed it down torso nanny candidates who have many similarities but a few big differences. They both stood out from the others that we interviewed and both could be a good fit for our family, but we are having the hardest time choosing one vs the other.
Nanny 1 is in her late 40s and has 3 adult kids (youngest in college). She has 15 years of experience and has had all long term 4+ year jobs. She was very chatty and energetic, and was also very confident in her abilities, saying kids love her and that she is a great nanny. She wants $1 more per hour than the other nanny, and says she isn’t negotiable on that.
Nanny 2 is 30 and doesn’t have kids (yet, she got married a year ago). She seemed very calm and cool in terms of demeanor. Seems like she genuinely loves kids and has about 5 years of experience but has been with 3 families who all let her go once the youngest was in preschool.
They both had excellent references, are willing to do the job duties we outlined, love to cook and do arts and crafts, know our specific neighborhood well, are good drivers, etc.
Any guidance for how to choose?
Without a question the younger one.
Anonymous wrote:We have narrowed it down torso nanny candidates who have many similarities but a few big differences. They both stood out from the others that we interviewed and both could be a good fit for our family, but we are having the hardest time choosing one vs the other.
Nanny 1 is in her late 40s and has 3 adult kids (youngest in college). She has 15 years of experience and has had all long term 4+ year jobs. She was very chatty and energetic, and was also very confident in her abilities, saying kids love her and that she is a great nanny. She wants $1 more per hour than the other nanny, and says she isn’t negotiable on that.
Nanny 2 is 30 and doesn’t have kids (yet, she got married a year ago). She seemed very calm and cool in terms of demeanor. Seems like she genuinely loves kids and has about 5 years of experience but has been with 3 families who all let her go once the youngest was in preschool.
They both had excellent references, are willing to do the job duties we outlined, love to cook and do arts and crafts, know our specific neighborhood well, are good drivers, etc.
Any guidance for how to choose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.
Are you legally required to give your nanny paid maternity leave??? Don’t they just quit once they get pregnant?
No more than any other worker quits the instant when they get pregnant. Their financial needs don't all of sudden disappear when they have a baby.![]()
Come on!
What’s the nanny supposed to do for childcare for her baby? Would she hire another nanny and use 100% of her earnings to pay her own nanny? You’re being ridiculous—of course nannies quit when they have kids of their own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.
Are you legally required to give your nanny paid maternity leave??? Don’t they just quit once they get pregnant?
No more than any other worker quits the instant when they get pregnant. Their financial needs don't all of sudden disappear when they have a baby.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Look, lots of kids go to pre-school at 3. This is not a question of retention, it's just the families needs change, and even if they would need a part-time nanny for pick up, their nanny may not want part time job, so she goes to nanny for another family. It does not mean she was not a great nanny. Also, ask if the college kid lives with mom and if vaccinated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.
Are you legally required to give your nanny paid maternity leave??? Don’t they just quit once they get pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.
Are you legally required to give your nanny paid maternity leave??? Don’t they just quit once they get pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.