Anonymous wrote:We have this too. It's call Travel Lite. The coaches are unpaid. It's for really good advanced teams, kids who just aren't quite good enough for travel, or kids who don't want the pressure of regular travel anymore and just want to play on a halfway-decent team. Once they get on a team they won't ever be cut the following year. It puts them under the travel umbrella, so they can player in a little better league and tournaments, but they aren't subjected to the normal politics of youth travel teams. It definitely fills a need for some kids and has bee pretty popular.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is a parent coaching? Is the club charging less since there isn't a paid coach?
No, club coach coaching. Like a normal travel team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a few teams like this in our club. They fit in between advanced and travel. One team has had the same kids since U-littles and are now around U15 or U16. They only pick up a player if one leaves. Same coach the entire time. They play in lower level travel tournaments. Not sure what league they play in. I don't see the problem with it. They would be like an E or F team if they were in our normal travel hierarchy. They don't have any effect on any of the normal travel teams, so I say let the kids play.
+10000000000
OP here. I think what irks me is that if this had been an option for my kid, we might have had a far better experience! He's on a top team, but its not gelling as it should.
Why can't you form your own team? I don't understand why you are irked.
Anonymous wrote:Is a parent coaching? Is the club charging less since there isn't a paid coach?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a few teams like this in our club. They fit in between advanced and travel. One team has had the same kids since U-littles and are now around U15 or U16. They only pick up a player if one leaves. Same coach the entire time. They play in lower level travel tournaments. Not sure what league they play in. I don't see the problem with it. They would be like an E or F team if they were in our normal travel hierarchy. They don't have any effect on any of the normal travel teams, so I say let the kids play.
+10000000000
OP here. I think what irks me is that if this had been an option for my kid, we might have had a far better experience! He's on a top team, but its not gelling as it should.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a few teams like this in our club. They fit in between advanced and travel. One team has had the same kids since U-littles and are now around U15 or U16. They only pick up a player if one leaves. Same coach the entire time. They play in lower level travel tournaments. Not sure what league they play in. I don't see the problem with it. They would be like an E or F team if they were in our normal travel hierarchy. They don't have any effect on any of the normal travel teams, so I say let the kids play.
+10000000000
Anonymous wrote:We have a few teams like this in our club. They fit in between advanced and travel. One team has had the same kids since U-littles and are now around U15 or U16. They only pick up a player if one leaves. Same coach the entire time. They play in lower level travel tournaments. Not sure what league they play in. I don't see the problem with it. They would be like an E or F team if they were in our normal travel hierarchy. They don't have any effect on any of the normal travel teams, so I say let the kids play.