Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aberration. In that age group, they took on a few very good players trained elsewhere. They play on two teams.

We have played them the last two years. They were not materially different.

If this is not a PPA promoting itself because it sure seems like it, you'd know that most of those players are new.

Let me guess - they were among the many that left Achilles.

I'm really curious about this.
My son is on a lower PPA 09 team, and we were told that there were a lot of 09 kids playing up over the last few years, and they decided to bring them back to their normal age year team, which is why there where so many new kids on Green.
Many other kids were pushed to lower teams because of this.
Is that not true?
Don't get me wrong, if they picked up a bunch of really good kids from other programs, I would be fine with that...but it would be odd to lie about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aberration. In that age group, they took on a few very good players trained elsewhere. They play on two teams.

I'm really curious about this.
My son is on a lower PPA 09 team, and we were told that there were a lot of 09 kids playing up over the last few years, and they decided to bring them back to their normal age year team, which is why there where so many new kids on Green.
Many other kids were pushed to lower teams because of this.
Is that not true?
Don't get me wrong, if they picked up a bunch of really good kids from other programs, I would be fine with that...but it would be odd to lie about it.

This is true. The "new" players are PPA players who had been playing up for a bit. Club decided to move everyone back to their normal age group. Nothing weird there and not an Achilles conspiracy. LOL.