Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Can we circle back to this, I would like to hear more.
You have a very narrow definition of a “nice life” if you can’t figure this out on your own. And you probably do which is why you’re complaining about this in the first place.
Budget $900k for SFH, safe, with good schools. Is that too narrow?
Davis, CA. Or San Rafael / Novato similar areas north of SF. But whether it's a nice life depends on your commute.
Is Davis considered part of Bay Area? I thought the schools San Rafael were having issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Can we circle back to this, I would like to hear more.
You have a very narrow definition of a “nice life” if you can’t figure this out on your own. And you probably do which is why you’re complaining about this in the first place.
Budget $900k for SFH, safe, with good schools. Is that too narrow?
Davis, CA. Or San Rafael / Novato similar areas north of SF. But whether it's a nice life depends on your commute.
Anonymous wrote:Have you looked at Oakland OP? It’s having a bit of Renaissance. Lots of good restaurants, parks are cleaned up, and housing still very affordable. You probably end up paying for private school, but Catholic is super cheap around here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Can we circle back to this, I would like to hear more.
You have a very narrow definition of a “nice life” if you can’t figure this out on your own. And you probably do which is why you’re complaining about this in the first place.
Budget $900k for SFH, safe, with good schools. Is that too narrow?
Anonymous wrote:Have you looked at Oakland OP? It’s having a bit of Renaissance. Lots of good restaurants, parks are cleaned up, and housing still very affordable. You probably end up paying for private school, but Catholic is super cheap around here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Can we circle back to this, I would like to hear more.
You have a very narrow definition of a “nice life” if you can’t figure this out on your own. And you probably do which is why you’re complaining about this in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Can we circle back to this, I would like to hear more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Bay Area is somewhat unique because the old adage "drive until you qualify" doesn't really apply. The suburbs are also insanely expensive.
That said, people need to accept that there's such a thing as luxury areas, where "normal" people can't afford to live, at all. It's not just Manhattan or Beverly Hills. There are many parts of America that normal families just cannot reasonably expect to move to. As someone who grew up in a midsized PacNW city this has always been obvious to me, but for some reason, it's a really bitter pill for many other people in my age range (I'm mid 30s with kids).
Sure but you can have a nice life within 2 hrs of Manhattan in White Plains or Jersey for a reasonable amount, even LA had some modestly priced neighborhoods compared to BH.
You can have a nice life 2 hours from the "Bay Area" too.
So where are places with good jobs, affordable housing and good schools 2 hours from BA?? Maybe Sacramento?
Following, we are on the market in the Bay Area!
Anonymous wrote:OP, I don't actually think that many people are moving back. I'm not. My friends are not.
I was born on the Peninsula, where my parents and extended family still live. All but one of my childhood friends have moved away; the remaining one lived with her spouse and 2 kids in her mom's basement until a couple years ago (we are both 40). None of my cousins still live there. My parents' friends are starting to move away to live near their adult kids and their grandkids in places like OR, CO, PA, and NY. I've given up trying to persuade my parents to move east but they are starting to be in the minority among their friends.
A few years ago DH and I looked hard at moving back to CA. I really, really wanted to make it work. We looked at living with my parents, living in a condo, living hours away, etc. We both would have had to change careers, we would have had to put kids in private school, we likely would not have had a yard ... it just didn't make sense and the quality of life would have been so drastically worse than what we have now. My parents have what, 10 to 15 years left in life, if we're lucky? And then when they pass, we will be stuck in an expensive uncomfortable housing situation (assuming fire didn't take everything) and subpar career situation, with no savings.
Also, if you have not been back to visit much, consider that the Bay Area you remember doesn't really exist anymore. The people, culture, traffic, demographics, etc. are very different. The BA of my childhood definitely is gone. Places change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you need a SFH or TH? Why not a condo? Something has yo compromised, and space is easy.
We lived in a condo till kids were 7, we know the compromise of that. Financially it’s a terrible decision b/C fees grow out of control. Hence why we want to protect our long term with a few simple property.
So the problem isn’t that you can’t afford to move back it’s that you can’t tolerate the necessary sacrifices to do so. This is just the flip side of people who move away from their rust belt towns because the well-paying jobs are gone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you need a SFH or TH? Why not a condo? Something has yo compromised, and space is easy.
We lived in a condo till kids were 7, we know the compromise of that. Financially it’s a terrible decision b/C fees grow out of control. Hence why we want to protect our long term with a few simple property.