Anonymous wrote:Commiseration. I have a beginner boy player (11 yo). He played with a previously mentioned rec team this spring and has found it hard to be “the worst” on the team which is filled with kids who have been playing for 4+ years. Doesn’t help that kids can be pretty mean about his lack of skill. I’ve been looking for a summer camp and a HS boy to teach him fundamentals over the summer. Some of the camps I’ve found for his age/grade specifically state they are for intermediate/advanced players, so I will be calling before committing to a camp. The last thing I want is for him to be in a camp filled with travel kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Find a private coach. Have him start at the outset learning to catch, throw and cradle with the off-hand. Tell him to hit the wall. If he’s athletic enough and works hard enough, he should be able to play and contribute. It also depends on the program he’s playing for in high school. Top private school programs (Prep, GZ, Landon) have players who have been playing since kindergarten and developed a fair amount of lacrosse IQ. The public schools tend to have less developed players so entry bar is lower. Remember that Paul Rabil never touched a stick until 7th grade.
Mine never touched a stick til right before 9th grade. Divison 1 college. HS varsity all four years. Fun stuff.
Ignore the whole must play for ever crowd.
Your kid might be the next Paul Rabil. But probably not.
I'd be inclined to ignore anons on DCUM who have unverifiable stories about how their kid never touched a stick until high school and then went on to play D1.![]()
There ‘a a senior on the Hopkins women’s lacrosse team who did just that. The better question is why this possibly makes you feel so threatened.
LMAO what a stupid reaction. In fact it sounds like YOU are the one who finds statistical reality threatening.
Keep citing exceptions here and there. Does it change the math of 121,000 high school kids and 3,600 D1 slots? NO.
Sure, the probability is quite low any kid will play in college, regardless of whether they start at age 7 or age 12.
OP here. Could we go back to recommendations? My kid is 12, and just starting out. Discussion of whether or not he can play D1 is a bit premature.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Find a private coach. Have him start at the outset learning to catch, throw and cradle with the off-hand. Tell him to hit the wall. If he’s athletic enough and works hard enough, he should be able to play and contribute. It also depends on the program he’s playing for in high school. Top private school programs (Prep, GZ, Landon) have players who have been playing since kindergarten and developed a fair amount of lacrosse IQ. The public schools tend to have less developed players so entry bar is lower. Remember that Paul Rabil never touched a stick until 7th grade.
Mine never touched a stick til right before 9th grade. Divison 1 college. HS varsity all four years. Fun stuff.
Ignore the whole must play for ever crowd.
Your kid might be the next Paul Rabil. But probably not.
I'd be inclined to ignore anons on DCUM who have unverifiable stories about how their kid never touched a stick until high school and then went on to play D1.![]()
There ‘a a senior on the Hopkins women’s lacrosse team who did just that. The better question is why this possibly makes you feel so threatened.
LMAO what a stupid reaction. In fact it sounds like YOU are the one who finds statistical reality threatening.
Keep citing exceptions here and there. Does it change the math of 121,000 high school kids and 3,600 D1 slots? NO.
Sure, the probability is quite low any kid will play in college, regardless of whether they start at age 7 or age 12.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Find a private coach. Have him start at the outset learning to catch, throw and cradle with the off-hand. Tell him to hit the wall. If he’s athletic enough and works hard enough, he should be able to play and contribute. It also depends on the program he’s playing for in high school. Top private school programs (Prep, GZ, Landon) have players who have been playing since kindergarten and developed a fair amount of lacrosse IQ. The public schools tend to have less developed players so entry bar is lower. Remember that Paul Rabil never touched a stick until 7th grade.
Mine never touched a stick til right before 9th grade. Divison 1 college. HS varsity all four years. Fun stuff.
Ignore the whole must play for ever crowd.
Your kid might be the next Paul Rabil. But probably not.
I'd be inclined to ignore anons on DCUM who have unverifiable stories about how their kid never touched a stick until high school and then went on to play D1.![]()
There ‘a a senior on the Hopkins women’s lacrosse team who did just that. The better question is why this possibly makes you feel so threatened.
LMAO what a stupid reaction. In fact it sounds like YOU are the one who finds statistical reality threatening.
Keep citing exceptions here and there. Does it change the math of 121,000 high school kids and 3,600 D1 slots? NO.