Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
These behemoth High Schools in the area don't help. DS' school usually has near 100 try out for boys soccer. Almost every kid here that tries out plays some form of club travel soccer. There's one varsity and one JV team. Back in the midwest where I grew up our big schools with 1,000 less kids would have a varsity, two JV and sometimes a Freshman team! It gave plenty of opportunity to play and there was some limited movement to help varsity from each of the JV squads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
if you still turn away the majority of kids who come out for tryouts there aren't enough spots
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids go to a school with no cuts for any sports and a sports requirement. The number of kids who try new things is inspiring. For the first time in a long time, after we switched to this kind of school, I see kids playing for fun again, even the really athletic kids. They get all the benefit of exercising and working hard to improve, being a part of team, having leadership opportunities, learning the thrill of victory and agony of defeat, with none of the other modern nonsense we are seeing in youth athletics.
The competitiveness of some leagues and schools (and we've been there too) is a disaster for development, and it is all related to college admissions, for profit youth sports, tracking kids to levels and labeling them according to ability, and measuring their worth based on these levels. It is all marketing. It is the same tactic used by the most addictive video games. Parent and their kids have become addicted to leveling up in pay to play sports.
One problem is that Physical Education is no longer physical education. The PE teachers are often big fat blobs, and the kids spend half the lessons studying health in a classroom instead of exercising, and the other half of the time they are engaged in dumbed down, low intensity exercise because proper exercise is too dangerous. There should be more PE classes and all kids should play proper sports in that time. Then the teams can indeed be competitive endeavors where some kids get to play and others get cut. Both types of program are useful.
Anonymous wrote:Good article. My ds’s friends are all doing travel soccer at 8 yrs old and it’s so tempting to get caught up in it. He’s on a less competitive team this Spring and is so happy that I’m going to go with my gut and not buy into travel soccer right now.
Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
Anonymous wrote:Evidence suggests that as young people compete more intensely in sports, gains in mental wellness may be replaced by mental health challenges particular to competitive athletics. Pre-pandemic, up to 20% of college athletes experienced major depression. For young athletes competing at national and international levels, anxiety and depression were 20% to 45% — higher in some cases than those in the age-matched control groups. In one study of elite Canadian swimmers, an eye-popping 68% met the criteria for depression.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Do public schools have freshman teams? I don't know of any. And even with varsity and JV, there are still plenty of kids shut out. My son's public school doesn't have any no cut sports.
Isn't freshman and JV kind of the same thing? Our public high school has JV soccer, basketball, field hockey, wrestling, baseball, and softball.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Do public schools have freshman teams? I don't know of any. And even with varsity and JV, there are still plenty of kids shut out. My son's public school doesn't have any no cut sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?