Anonymous wrote:Alex Morgan specialized late and became a soccer star. However, it would be wrong to conclude from this fact alone that if you want your daughter to become a soccer star, her best chance is to specialize late.
It is unclear whether Alex Morgan became a soccer star because she specialized late, or in spite of it. In other words, was her chance of becoming a star higher if she specialized early or late?
I'd be curious to see if there is a study that looks at early vs late specialization in soccer alone, for both risk of injuries, but also for chance of playing in college or going pro. My uninformed guess is that most male professional soccer players specialized early. Again, my uninformed guess is that current women professional soccer players are more likely to have specialized late than men. But maybe girls are now increasingly behaving more like boys and are specializing earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best athletes do multiple sports - there are a ton of studies on this. Most pro athletes did not start their sport at 6 years old and only do that one sport. This is well known.
Was Messi a great basketball player as a kid?
At full adult height of 5’6” and taking hormones as a kid to reach that height..doubtful.
Alex Morgan was and didn’t move to Club soccer (from rec) until the age of 14.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best athletes do multiple sports - there are a ton of studies on this. Most pro athletes did not start their sport at 6 years old and only do that one sport. This is well known.
Was Messi a great basketball player as a kid?
At full adult height of 5’6” and taking hormones as a kid to reach that height..doubtful.
Alex Morgan was and didn’t move to Club soccer (from rec) until the age of 14.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best athletes do multiple sports - there are a ton of studies on this. Most pro athletes did not start their sport at 6 years old and only do that one sport. This is well known.
Was Messi a great basketball player as a kid?
Anonymous wrote:The best athletes do multiple sports - there are a ton of studies on this. Most pro athletes did not start their sport at 6 years old and only do that one sport. This is well known.
Anonymous wrote:When there are conflicts among the activities which wins out?
Super Y is usually coached by the same people at the club. Practices are the same(they do the same stuff they do during the season) and against the same players. The same peking order is enforced by what team your kid is on- ie top team players will take to corners and penalty kicks. There is no room for trying different positions, little risk taking or experimenting and no relief from the pressure of the club’s coach evaluating everything you do. This is a good time to get exposed to different coaches, players, style of play, play with older kids, younger kids, different skill levels, do things the coach would yell at you for, etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always liked this article:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/opinion/sports-should-be-childs-play.amp.html
Fwiw I ran track in college but didn’t start it until HS. I beat out a lot of others who ran younger and burned out by HS. I ran around in other sports until then. (Soccer / LAX)
It is a very interesting and provocative article. I wish it included some important additional information to better quantify the risks and benefits of early specialization. In terms of risk of injury, do you have the same risk if you specialize early at swimming, gymnastics, soccer, baseball, or football? is it the same for boys vs girls? It's hard to tell. One of the references includes the following conclusion:
"Injured follow up subjects were more likely to be female (p<0.02), report age of specialization <12 (p=0.03) and participate in year round training>8 mths/yr (p<0.03), and a higher proportion were more highly specialized."
I cannot access the whole article because it is behind a paywall. But the conclusions don't differentiate by sport. The authors also don't seem to control for the confounding possibility that children who specialize early might also be more likely to play hard (at whatever they play) than children who don't specialize early, and might therefore be more likely to get injured per hour of play. In other words, maybe children who specialize early are different than those who do not.
Also, say that you are not as much interested in minimizing the risk of injury, but instead you want to maximize the risk of your child getting a scholarship or becoming a professional athlete. This is probably not a prudent approach for most people.. but let's say you have a very talented and motivated child. Should they specialize early? does it depend on their gender? their sport? it's also hard to tell. In your case, you were able to specialize to track in college. However you probably couldn't have specialized late into being a baseball pitcher, or a soccer player.
As it is probably clear from this post, I had a very open lunch time break that allowed me to wonder about these issues that are probably not interesting to anyone else... I hope all your kids remain injury free and enjoy your summer.
Anonymous wrote:I always liked this article:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/opinion/sports-should-be-childs-play.amp.html
Fwiw I ran track in college but didn’t start it until HS. I beat out a lot of others who ran younger and burned out by HS. I ran around in other sports until then. (Soccer / LAX)