Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Clemson looking for? My kid with a 28 ACT and a 3.5 gpa was rejected. They may get more freshman applicants, but they’re not going to get what they’re looking for.
28 is a low SAT— especially since Clemson is largely engineering.
Anonymous wrote:What is Clemson looking for? My kid with a 28 ACT and a 3.5 gpa was rejected. They may get more freshman applicants, but they’re not going to get what they’re looking for.
Anonymous wrote:How are schools like Clemson (51% acc rate) and UNCC (65% acc rate) on this list? Does that mean that they screwed up rejected too many and are now looking for new applications?
Anonymous wrote:Why is Boston University on here?
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to realize that all the kids are fighting for spots in the same 75 schools. None of the others are that hard to get in with average stats.
Some people have been trying to point this out on here for a long time, but the T20 or Bust crowd can’t be convinced that there is a great education to be had at lots of other schools.
Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to realize that all the kids are fighting for spots in the same 75 schools. None of the others are that hard to get in with average stats.
Anonymous wrote:Schools may want to maintain their standards, so they have places left but only for qualified applicants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are some good schools on the list. Juniata, Ohio Wesleyan University, Providence College, Presbyterian College, Quinnipiac, University of Colorado Boulder, Ursinus College, Xavier. Kinda surprising. Nice to know there are still options if anyone is still looking.
This is interesting in light of the anecdotes people are sharing about high stats kids that got rejected or WL everywhere. It seems as though a lot of students went heavy on reaches.
Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to realize that all the kids are fighting for spots in the same 75 schools. None of the others are that hard to get in with average stats.