Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t AOC want regular people to have police protection?

99.8% of people don’t get death and rapes threats on a daily basis. Do you?

Really? Tell that to the people brutally raped and/or murdered everyday! I swear if people like you aren’t personally getting raped and murdered, you believe such things do not exist. People get raped and murdered EVERYDAY!

That’s not what this is. Do you know this and you’re arguing in bad faith, or do you honestly not understand what famous women have to deal with?

FAMOUS WOMEN? Are you serious? How about women and girls of all ages and colors and socio-economic status and educational level? Do you even hear yourself?

Women with no money or little money and no anything have to live in this world every damn day and nobody gives a damn how they get by. And they get assaulted, harassed, raped, molested, injured, fired, murdered, etc, everyday. And they are too scared to speak, seek help, are powerless and voiceless, in some cases. So cry me a river for AOC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

People calling for defunding the police are doing so to make people MORE safe not less. They're not pro crime. They are anti police killing private citizens willy nilly. Which you obviously know but are still snarkily pretending means something different.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

No she's not. You're just paranoid.

+1

Is this the equivalent of when Republicans accuse Democrats of having Trump Derangement Syndrome? Only, instead of fomenting an armed insurrection, courting white nationalists, and debasing the office of the President of the United States, there's... uh... I dunno... some Tweets about police reform I guess?

Notice how Republicans on this board complain so vociferously against AOC but can never quote anything terribly specific that she has said or done other than... being a bartender, I guess? Which is a bad thing when Democrats do it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t AOC want regular people to have police protection?

99.8% of people don’t get death and rapes threats on a daily basis. Do you?

Really? Tell that to the people brutally raped and/or murdered everyday! I swear if people like you aren’t personally getting raped and murdered, you believe such things do not exist. People get raped and murdered EVERYDAY!

Exactly!!!!!! But PP doesn’t care about regular Americans, and probably never lived in a neighborhood where violent crime is an everyday occurrence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t AOC want regular people to have police protection?

99.8% of people don’t get death and rapes threats on a daily basis. Do you?

Really? Tell that to the people brutally raped and/or murdered everyday! I swear if people like you aren’t personally getting raped and murdered, you believe such things do not exist. People get raped and murdered EVERYDAY!

That’s not what this is. Do you know this and you’re arguing in bad faith, or do you honestly not understand what famous women have to deal with?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t AOC want regular people to have police protection?

99.8% of people don’t get death and rapes threats on a daily basis. Do you?

Really? Tell that to the people brutally raped and/or murdered everyday! I swear if people like you aren’t personally getting raped and murdered, you believe such things do not exist. People get raped and murdered EVERYDAY!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

No she's not. You're just paranoid.

+1

Is this the equivalent of when Republicans accuse Democrats of having Trump Derangement Syndrome? Only, instead of fomenting an armed insurrection, courting white nationalists, and debasing the office of the President of the United States, there's... uh... I dunno... some Tweets about police reform I guess?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

Yeah, can't wait till MTG takes her apart in the debate!
'murica!

obvious troll is obvious.

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

Yeah, can't wait till MTG takes her apart in the debate!
'murica!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

No she's not. You're just paranoid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

Touché

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I’m with you there. The problem is not that she has security, it’s that she is pushing policies that make the rest of us less safe while ensuring SHE is safe.

Anonymous wrote:I love it when Republicans use ad hominem attacks because they know they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to substantive policy debates.

+1. It’s so blatant at this point, I would be embarrassed to even post this if I were them. Guess they are beyond shame though.

I’m guessing a contributor or benefactor is quietly picking up the tab for her.

And as far as I’m concerned, that’s money well-spent. She needs to protected and safe, so she can keep uttering facepalm-worthy statements as often as possible. She’s the younger face of democrat party, and I want her to be able to say as many stupid things as she can. And she hasn’t disappointed thus far.

I love it when Republicans use ad hominem attacks because they know they don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to substantive policy debates.