Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
How long do you think it takes to analyze that much data and pull together an analysis with full discussion section? Honest question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Out of my family and circle of friends I was the first to line up for every other vaccine, flu, Tdap, hepatitis vaccines. I am not getting this one though, at least not until it has been approved for a year or so. Call me all the names you want, it’s help turning me off to the vaccines even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Out of my family and circle of friends I was the first to line up for every other vaccine, flu, Tdap, hepatitis vaccines. I am not getting this one though, at least not until it has been approved for a year or so. Call me all the names you want, it’s help turning me off to the vaccines even more.
Then by all means, jump out of the gene pool.
Asshole.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Out of my family and circle of friends I was the first to line up for every other vaccine, flu, Tdap, hepatitis vaccines. I am not getting this one though, at least not until it has been approved for a year or so. Call me all the names you want, it’s help turning me off to the vaccines even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Out of my family and circle of friends I was the first to line up for every other vaccine, flu, Tdap, hepatitis vaccines. I am not getting this one though, at least not until it has been approved for a year or so. Call me all the names you want, it’s help turning me off to the vaccines even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Out of my family and circle of friends I was the first to line up for every other vaccine, flu, Tdap, hepatitis vaccines. I am not getting this one though, at least not until it has been approved for a year or so. Call me all the names you want, it’s help turning me off to the vaccines even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
They will find something else...maybe they can start saying vaccines cause autism again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sure PP is glad to hear it and will cease that line of criticism.
Although some of us want long term information, preferably 2+ years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
So when the FDA waves its magic wand, will we see a jump in vaccination rate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?
Yes, maybe by this afternoon.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure PP is glad to hear it and will cease that line of criticism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what’s the difference between “approval” and “authorization”, as far as vaccines are concerned?
emergency use authorization is granted when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In this case, 2 months of data was required along with the fact that there was no adequate approved alternative.
approval requires 6 months of data
Tick tock. It's been 6 months. Should be approved any day no?