Anonymous wrote:I grew up in Europe and find the youth travel soccer business here completely alien. Why have 9 and 10 year olds sit in a car for 4 hours on a weekend to go beat some poor team 7-0 just to preserve, for proud parents, the conceit that they can’t get a competitive game locally? Why not have them out in local park playing - surely switching those 5 hours with just an hour of playing time for a couple of hours coaching and a couple of hours of scrimmages/pick-up games would do far more for their development (not to mention a more fun childhood)? This strict focus on playing age-groups together is also weird to me - I learnt the most soccer from trying to keep up with the older kids from the neighborhood.
The non-travel teams apparently often have crap/parent coaches though.
Is there a third option? High quality regular (2-3x/wk) coaching with games against the best of neighborhood/city teams and maybe travel to a tournament once a season?
Bethesda has options for something like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
love this idea. maybe we can do it in summer. currently a lot of high school kids are busy with varsity soccer at Virginia.
+1. Parents hold the key to this. If people are able to organize large snowball fights, it shouldn’t be difficult to organize these types of soccer games in local parks, communities, etc.
Sadly, people do try to organize pick up soccer on the board and guess what, noone shows. It's all talk that people want their kids to do pick up. It's just a buzz word to them. Summer is right around the corner. There will be plenty of pick up soccer opportunities. Very few will attend....again.
In Fairfax, people show, then they get kicked off the field when the club team with the permit shows up. Free doesn't work when every turf or even mowed field is booked for every hour that it's light outside
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
love this idea. maybe we can do it in summer. currently a lot of high school kids are busy with varsity soccer at Virginia.
+1. Parents hold the key to this. If people are able to organize large snowball fights, it shouldn’t be difficult to organize these types of soccer games in local parks, communities, etc.
Sadly, people do try to organize pick up soccer on the board and guess what, noone shows. It's all talk that people want their kids to do pick up. It's just a buzz word to them. Summer is right around the corner. There will be plenty of pick up soccer opportunities. Very few will attend....again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
love this idea. maybe we can do it in summer. currently a lot of high school kids are busy with varsity soccer at Virginia.
+1. Parents hold the key to this. If people are able to organize large snowball fights, it shouldn’t be difficult to organize these types of soccer games in local parks, communities, etc.
Sadly, people do try to organize pick up soccer on the board and guess what, noone shows. It's all talk that people want their kids to do pick up. It's just a buzz word to them. Summer is right around the corner. There will be plenty of pick up soccer opportunities. Very few will attend....again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
love this idea. maybe we can do it in summer. currently a lot of high school kids are busy with varsity soccer at Virginia.
+1. Parents hold the key to this. If people are able to organize large snowball fights, it shouldn’t be difficult to organize these types of soccer games in local parks, communities, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
love this idea. maybe we can do it in summer. currently a lot of high school kids are busy with varsity soccer at Virginia.
Anonymous wrote:There’s countless articles and posts about how bad the US pay to play system is. Nothing discussed in this thread is/will be any different.
How about using DCUM to organize more free play soccer for the kids? It doesn’t have to be a full 11v11 game but rather smaller groups such as 5v5, etc. Winner stays just like street basketball.
Anonymous wrote:now that DA is gone, ODP might get some value back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With an incompetent national federation, generally ignorant populace, tiny professional structure that is spread over a massive geographical area, and an infrastructure of local neighborhood clubs controlling fields this is where we are stuck. Lots of competing “elite” money grab leagues with coaches and administrators looking out for their paychecks over the good of the players and actual development.
There should be regionalized competitive structure with a defined pathway for players (local neighborhood rec - local travel - regional travel) where coaches actively push players to the appropriate level, but instead coaches cling to players that can win them games. The extra long travel component that has developed over the past 10 years is ridiculous, especially in an area like this. Time and cost are out of control.
+1
+100
Anonymous wrote:Well they actually had a smart way to do it (ODP), but everyone shits on that now, especially since elite private clubs took over. You could have the relatively local playing clubs, but then your best players tryout for a state pool that plays other states or regions. This way your average player doesn't have to travel insane amounts and you push the best players to the top no matter where they come from. Now the big clubs keep all the players paying vast sums of money and crazy travel for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With an incompetent national federation, generally ignorant populace, tiny professional structure that is spread over a massive geographical area, and an infrastructure of local neighborhood clubs controlling fields this is where we are stuck. Lots of competing “elite” money grab leagues with coaches and administrators looking out for their paychecks over the good of the players and actual development.
There should be regionalized competitive structure with a defined pathway for players (local neighborhood rec - local travel - regional travel) where coaches actively push players to the appropriate level, but instead coaches cling to players that can win them games. The extra long travel component that has developed over the past 10 years is ridiculous, especially in an area like this. Time and cost are out of control.
+1