Anonymous wrote:^ we already have pro leagues. The camaraderie and fun of the Olympics was ruined.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great result. Best teams play each other and they keep the money. Everyone will watch.
one or two US teams will be added before long.
It's all part and parcel of global fascism. Huge corporations, huge (soon to be global) government, big tech, big pharma, big olympics. Massive corruption everywhere. And all the wealth flows into the hands of a tiny minority and screw everyone else. Big soccer just latest small piece of the puzzle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great result. Best teams play each other and they keep the money. Everyone will watch.
one or two US teams will be added before long.
It's all part and parcel of global fascism. Huge corporations, huge (soon to be global) government, big tech, big pharma, big olympics. Massive corruption everywhere. And all the wealth flows into the hands of a tiny minority and screw everyone else. Big soccer just latest small piece of the puzzle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great result. Best teams play each other and they keep the money. Everyone will watch.
one or two US teams will be added before long.
It's all part and parcel of global fascism. Huge corporations, huge (soon to be global) government, big tech, big pharma, big olympics. Massive corruption everywhere. And all the wealth flows into the hands of a tiny minority and screw everyone else. Big soccer just latest small piece of the puzzle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible idea.
A few rich teams owned by oligarchs taking all the money. Bad for football, terrible for smaller teams and the awful for fans. So much greed and power from a very small group of people.
Very sad.
When someone invests billions of dollars in their franchise, they want to protect their investment. Super League is how they do that. Long gone are the times where local supporters are the ones who keep the clubs afloat. TV and merchandising are their primary revenue streams, not ticket sales. You also have many foreign owners with no allegiance to the old system that has been in place for decades. The American owners of clubs are probably the biggest supporters of a Super League being that is how American sports have operated, since their inception. There are more Manchester United fans outside of England than in it. They would rather see them play Real Madrid and PSG than watch them play Burnley twice a year. These big clubs have to make Champions League and do fairly well in it in order to pay these ridiculous prices for players. They are taking that gamble out of play to ensure they always get to that level. I actually don't blame them. They are a business and can do what they want. I don't really like it personally, but youth soccer here does the same thing just on a much smaller level. It all comes down to money in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Great result. Best teams play each other and they keep the money. Everyone will watch.
one or two US teams will be added before long.
Anonymous wrote:Wasnt Premier League, which only began in 1992, a similar super league that broke from a 100 year old league? Seemed to work out ok for them. Maybe this will too
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible idea.
A few rich teams owned by oligarchs taking all the money. Bad for football, terrible for smaller teams and the awful for fans. So much greed and power from a very small group of people.
Very sad.
When someone invests billions of dollars in their franchise, they want to protect their investment. Super League is how they do that. Long gone are the times where local supporters are the ones who keep the clubs afloat. TV and merchandising are their primary revenue streams, not ticket sales. You also have many foreign owners with no allegiance to the old system that has been in place for decades. The American owners of clubs are probably the biggest supporters of a Super League being that is how American sports have operated, since their inception. There are more Manchester United fans outside of England than in it. They would rather see them play Real Madrid and PSG than watch them play Burnley twice a year. These big clubs have to make Champions League and do fairly well in it in order to pay these ridiculous prices for players. They are taking that gamble out of play to ensure they always get to that level. I actually don't blame them. They are a business and can do what they want. I don't really like it personally, but youth soccer here does the same thing just on a much smaller level. It all comes down to money in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible idea.
A few rich teams owned by oligarchs taking all the money. Bad for football, terrible for smaller teams and the awful for fans. So much greed and power from a very small group of people.
Very sad.
When someone invests billions of dollars in their franchise, they want to protect their investment. Super League is how they do that. Long gone are the times where local supporters are the ones who keep the clubs afloat. TV and merchandising are their primary revenue streams, not ticket sales. You also have many foreign owners with no allegiance to the old system that has been in place for decades. The American owners of clubs are probably the biggest supporters of a Super League being that is how American sports have operated, since their inception. There are more Manchester United fans outside of England than in it. They would rather see them play Real Madrid and PSG than watch them play Burnley twice a year. These big clubs have to make Champions League and do fairly well in it in order to pay these ridiculous prices for players. They are taking that gamble out of play to ensure they always get to that level. I actually don't blame them. They are a business and can do what they want. I don't really like it personally, but youth soccer here does the same thing just on a much smaller level. It all comes down to money in the end.
Soccer should not be following the US model.
Maybe not, but the fact is no team from outside the top 5 major leagues in Europe has won Champions League in over 15 years and that was Porto. Then you have to go back another 10 to find the second closest in Ajax. These smaller leagues have even less of a shot now then they did back then. This might make Europa League a better tournament and relative again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Terrible idea.
A few rich teams owned by oligarchs taking all the money. Bad for football, terrible for smaller teams and the awful for fans. So much greed and power from a very small group of people.
Very sad.
When someone invests billions of dollars in their franchise, they want to protect their investment. Super League is how they do that. Long gone are the times where local supporters are the ones who keep the clubs afloat. TV and merchandising are their primary revenue streams, not ticket sales. You also have many foreign owners with no allegiance to the old system that has been in place for decades. The American owners of clubs are probably the biggest supporters of a Super League being that is how American sports have operated, since their inception. There are more Manchester United fans outside of England than in it. They would rather see them play Real Madrid and PSG than watch them play Burnley twice a year. These big clubs have to make Champions League and do fairly well in it in order to pay these ridiculous prices for players. They are taking that gamble out of play to ensure they always get to that level. I actually don't blame them. They are a business and can do what they want. I don't really like it personally, but youth soccer here does the same thing just on a much smaller level. It all comes down to money in the end.
Soccer should not be following the US model.