Anonymous wrote:Why are people constantly posting these Ivy ranking threads? So weird. Is OP just an obsessive poster. OP, you must have a screw loose if in your head you are truly wondering whether Penn is prestigious or not. I feel sorry for your kids.
Anonymous wrote:
I attended hs in the 1980s in NJ - students at my HS with SAT scores in the 1300s were consisrently admitted to Columbia
back then. It was definitely considered an easier ivy to gain admittance (ditto Cornell).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.
Cornell only became associated with being at the bottom of the Ivy League with the rise of USNWR. Cornell gets dinged in that ranking for any number of reasons, but for a very long while it was considered solidly middle of the pack. Used to be considered very similarly to how Stanford is seen nowadays.
I question the PP who suggested Columbia used to be less prestigious than Penn. Certainly not the case; has always been considered right behind HYP.
Anonymous wrote:Why are people constantly posting these Ivy ranking threads? So weird. Is OP just an obsessive poster. OP, you must have a screw loose if in your head you are truly wondering whether Penn is prestigious or not. I feel sorry for your kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.
Cornell only became associated with being at the bottom of the Ivy League with the rise of USNWR. Cornell gets dinged in that ranking for any number of reasons, but for a very long while it was considered solidly middle of the pack. Used to be considered very similarly to how Stanford is seen nowadays.
I question the PP who suggested Columbia used to be less prestigious than Penn. Certainly not the case; has always been considered right behind HYP.
For undergraduate? No. Only with the resurgence of NYC did Columbia College begin to clearly become viewed as a step below HYP but a step above the other Ivies. Maybe it was different when it came to the graduate/professional schools.
Anonymous wrote:Only on DCUM is an ivy league school not prestigious.
Christ on a whole wheat cracker, give it a break with the preposterous elitism for like five minutes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.
Cornell only became associated with being at the bottom of the Ivy League with the rise of USNWR. Cornell gets dinged in that ranking for any number of reasons, but for a very long while it was considered solidly middle of the pack. Used to be considered very similarly to how Stanford is seen nowadays.
I question the PP who suggested Columbia used to be less prestigious than Penn. Certainly not the case; has always been considered right behind HYP.
For undergraduate? No. Only with the resurgence of NYC did Columbia College begin to clearly become viewed as a step below HYP but a step above the other Ivies. Maybe it was different when it came to the graduate/professional schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.
Cornell only became associated with being at the bottom of the Ivy League with the rise of USNWR. Cornell gets dinged in that ranking for any number of reasons, but for a very long while it was considered solidly middle of the pack. Used to be considered very similarly to how Stanford is seen nowadays.
I question the PP who suggested Columbia used to be less prestigious than Penn. Certainly not the case; has always been considered right behind HYP.
Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.
Anonymous wrote:I always thought Cornell was at the bottom.