Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you hit on a particular pet peeve of mine, which is when people talking about breastfeeding but what they really mean is pumping. Would i breastfeed under your circumstances? No. Pumping sucks. The experience of actually breastfeeding your child is different and I think that is worth it. I just wish people would stop giving BREASTFEEDING a bad name when what they're really talking about is pumping and bottle feeding.
I think they necessarily go hand in hand. Of course in an ideal world (or Europe) we would all have lots of time off work with a new baby, so we could spend the first year of our child's life feeding and caring for them however we see fit. But if I choose to dedicate myself to breastfeeding, I am resigning myself to pumping unless I quit my job. I couldn't maintain my supply when I'm out of the house 11 hours a day, 5 days a week, if I didn't pump. Therefore, I would not be able to breastfeed. For me, though, it's also the reality of never having the freedom or independence to leave the house without my baby. And I don't think that's unreasonable.
I think what you're talking about is part of a larger conversation than just, "Breastfeeding is good, pumping is bad."
I am 100% pro paid parental leave for all. But it's important to point out that in Europe those policies were designed to encourage women specifically to stay home and there is evidence it impacts women's workforce participation and compensation. Parental leave policies should be available to men and women, and there is NOTHING wrong with going back to work whenever you are ready. And like you say, not wanting to be chained to your baby 24/7 is 100% a valid reason to not breastfeed and/or supplement with formula.
Anonymous wrote:OP here-I can't overstate how much I appreciate all these responses. It's difficult to find frank discussions about breastfeeding without having to wade through the many obsessive articles and testimonials about the magic of it all. I do think I will likely try it in the very beginning to provide colostrum for the baby, but I am concerned about the mental health impact of being tied to this physical act (especially for the first few months). I want to have the freedom to do something as simple as leave my baby with my husband for a couple hours and go to on a walk or to run errands, without worrying he is going to be hungry and inconsolable. I'm prone to pervasive anxiety and I'm concerned that the dynamic could be difficult for me to navigate, which impacts everyone in the household.
My mother did not EBF and did both with myself and my two siblings, and said that worked well for her. A friend of mine is trying to nurse and use formula, but her baby is totally refusing the bottle. She works from home, though, and I don't, so she's been able to make it work. I have about 8 weeks off and want to make sure the baby is fed whether I'm home or not. I also want to maintain my sanity at a time that I know will be emotionally charged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you hit on a particular pet peeve of mine, which is when people talking about breastfeeding but what they really mean is pumping. Would i breastfeed under your circumstances? No. Pumping sucks. The experience of actually breastfeeding your child is different and I think that is worth it. I just wish people would stop giving BREASTFEEDING a bad name when what they're really talking about is pumping and bottle feeding.
I think they necessarily go hand in hand. Of course in an ideal world (or Europe) we would all have lots of time off work with a new baby, so we could spend the first year of our child's life feeding and caring for them however we see fit. But if I choose to dedicate myself to breastfeeding, I am resigning myself to pumping unless I quit my job. I couldn't maintain my supply when I'm out of the house 11 hours a day, 5 days a week, if I didn't pump. Therefore, I would not be able to breastfeed. For me, though, it's also the reality of never having the freedom or independence to leave the house without my baby. And I don't think that's unreasonable.
I think what you're talking about is part of a larger conversation than just, "Breastfeeding is good, pumping is bad."
Anonymous wrote:OP, you hit on a particular pet peeve of mine, which is when people talking about breastfeeding but what they really mean is pumping. Would i breastfeed under your circumstances? No. Pumping sucks. The experience of actually breastfeeding your child is different and I think that is worth it. I just wish people would stop giving BREASTFEEDING a bad name when what they're really talking about is pumping and bottle feeding.
Anonymous wrote:I know numerous women who chosen to breast feed for similar reasons, and totally support you in your choice to do so. Formula is really good and there are lots of ways to bond with your baby (including while feeding them formula!). And you are right there are other advantages, like being able to share feeding duties with your partner. And pumping is miserable. I EBF for about a year and while I enjoyed nursing, I hated pumping with the passion of a thousand suns and pretty much always resented having to do it. If your work is not supportive of it, that makes it much worse (mine was a huge pain about it and I worked in an open plan office at the time so I really had to demand accommodations and they made me feel terrible about it.
You should do what you want.