Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't understand how in-class differentiation works or how personalize learning can make tracking obsolete means that you need to keep up with the world of education. It's not the 80s any longer. Your genius child will be just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tracking kids early leaves some kids behind FOREVER. My kid is gifted in math. Does he need to be in a separate class. No he does not. Public schooling is not for every snowflake. It's for ALL kids. For once can you broaden your circle of concern beyond your own child?
No?
That's your problem. Not the state's. Grow up.
Forcing dumb kids into the same class as smart kids means the dumb kids grow resentful and the smart kids grow bored and have their potential stunted.
The result of this will be parents with means moving their kids into charter or private schools. Those without the means will be stuck with the dumbed down curriculum and peers for their children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't understand how in-class differentiation works or how personalize learning can make tracking obsolete means that you need to keep up with the world of education. It's not the 80s any longer. Your genius child will be just fine.
Ha! Most of us DO know how it works even if we have kids in AAP because that is supposedly what was happening with our kids in K-2. Except what I meant in practice was that the advanced kids were ALWAYS the reading group that got skipped if the week was slightly shorter or missing class time for some reason and what was done extra in math was far from clear in most cases. At best it was a once a week pull out for a short but mostly computer time as a “reward” for done early.
“Many/most Singaporean schools shifted to in class differentiation at least in primary and we should be so lucky as to have their math outcomes “
I am sure it CAN be done well. Montessori does this too. What I am positive of is that FCPS cannot as they already show they do not do this well in the cases where classes are mixed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tracking kids early leaves some kids behind FOREVER. My kid is gifted in math. Does he need to be in a separate class. No he does not. Public schooling is not for every snowflake. It's for ALL kids. For once can you broaden your circle of concern beyond your own child?
No?
That's your problem. Not the state's. Grow up.
I don't see why tracking has to be permanent. Start kids in the same place and move them between tracks (or groups or however you'd like to do it) once or even twice a year depending on how they're doing with a concept. I went to a high school with a couple different honors tracks and it was NBD to be in honors algebra but not honors geometry.
Somewhat off topic but I think you could get good results with single-gender math groups also. There's been some research on that, especially for girls.
Anonymous wrote:Tracking kids early leaves some kids behind FOREVER. My kid is gifted in math. Does he need to be in a separate class. No he does not. Public schooling is not for every snowflake. It's for ALL kids. For once can you broaden your circle of concern beyond your own child?
No?
That's your problem. Not the state's. Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:There are other systems that work this way, with good math outcomes. Many/most Singaporean schools shifted to in class differentiation at least in primary and we should be so lucky as to have their math outcomes
Before anyone gets any ideas, no not everyone in Singapore is rich, despite that global stereotype.
Anonymous wrote:What grade will this "awesome new plan" start for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't understand how in-class differentiation works or how personalize learning can make tracking obsolete means that you need to keep up with the world of education. It's not the 80s any longer. Your genius child will be just fine.
Ha! Most of us DO know how it works even if we have kids in AAP because that is supposedly what was happening with our kids in K-2. Except what I meant in practice was that the advanced kids were ALWAYS the reading group that got skipped if the week was slightly shorter or missing class time for some reason and what was done extra in math was far from clear in most cases. At best it was a once a week pull out for a short but mostly computer time as a “reward” for done early.
“Many/most Singaporean schools shifted to in class differentiation at least in primary and we should be so lucky as to have their math outcomes “
I am sure it CAN be done well. Montessori does this too. What I am positive of is that FCPS cannot as they already show they do not do this well in the cases where classes are mixed.
Anonymous wrote:Tracking kids early leaves some kids behind FOREVER. My kid is gifted in math. Does he need to be in a separate class. No he does not. Public schooling is not for every snowflake. It's for ALL kids. For once can you broaden your circle of concern beyond your own child?
No?
That's your problem. Not the state's. Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't understand how in-class differentiation works or how personalize learning can make tracking obsolete means that you need to keep up with the world of education. It's not the 80s any longer. Your genius child will be just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't understand how in-class differentiation works or how personalize learning can make tracking obsolete means that you need to keep up with the world of education. It's not the 80s any longer. Your genius child will be just fine.
Anonymous wrote:If my kid is currently in 8th grade and will graduate in 2025, will she at all be affected by this? (Looking at the timeline my guess is no?)