Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe at some point, Fox News adherents will understand how badly they have been mislead over the last 20 years, and acutely over the last 8.

Maybe not, but one can dream.

The message that really comes out in all this is that Tucker, Ingraham, Hannity, Murdoch etc. think their viewers are a bunch of idiots. Will they continue to prove them right?

Yep! I hope Dominion destroys FOX.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe at some point, Fox News adherents will understand how badly they have been mislead over the last 20 years, and acutely over the last 8.

Maybe not, but one can dream.

The message that really comes out in all this is that Tucker, Ingraham, Hannity, Murdoch etc. think their viewers are a bunch of idiots. Will they continue to prove them right?

Maybe at some point, Fox News adherents will understand how badly they have been mislead over the last 20 years, and acutely over the last 8.

Maybe not, but one can dream.

Anonymous wrote:Dominion has a pretty much slam dunk case. Shocking the defendants are not trying to settle.

Yup.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. It'll get tossed. You can't sue a network for simply reporting the news.

That's not getting tossed.

+1. See also, Alex Jones

A “journalist” (multiple “journalists”) went on Fox News and lied. They flat out admit they knew they were lying. They were told to cease and desist and and kept lying. There is no non-conspiracy nut evidence to back up the lie.

Dominion suffered damage to its business reputation.

A 3L should be able to win this defamation suit.

So was Hannity lying then on the air or is he lying now under oath?

The Smartmatic case is even stronger.

Dominion has a pretty much slam dunk case. Shocking the defendants are not trying to settle.

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. It'll get tossed. You can't sue a network for simply reporting the news.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. It'll get tossed. You can't sue a network for simply reporting the news.

Promise us that you’ll look yourself in the mirror and say “I’m an idiot” once it’s clear how wrong you are. Promise?

Go find a mirror, PP!

Ouch!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. It'll get tossed. You can't sue a network for simply reporting the news.

Promise us that you’ll look yourself in the mirror and say “I’m an idiot” once it’s clear how wrong you are. Promise?

Go find a mirror, PP!

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious. It'll get tossed. You can't sue a network for simply reporting the news.

Promise us that you’ll look yourself in the mirror and say “I’m an idiot” once it’s clear how wrong you are. Promise?

All they have to prove is that some of the machines were online. And with articles like this? That's easy to do:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436

I guess they did release a kraken after all.