Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
1. not every non political person is Trump like, plus this is a county executive election, not a presidential one.
2. Elrich has mismanaged the county
3. Blair has been in the trenches, both as a business person and working with charities and non profits.
4. When was the last real world, non political experience Elrich had?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't underestimate the pro-Elrich vote. His base consists of the following:
1. Labor unions
2. Socialists
3. Opponents to development (From the right and from the left, NIMBYs and tree huggers)
4. Various social justice warriors and civic activists, Takoma Park types
and now a fifth component:
Covid Karens, the "shelter forever" types who complain on Nextdoor about runners not wearing masks
Sadly I see this making up a strong plurality of the vote.
Not to direct this only at you, but this thread could be a great place to discuss reasons to vote FOR Blair — not just against Elrich. When I voted, I didn’t have the sense that Blair reached out to me with good reasons why someone like me should vote for him or for someone like him. It was great to meet him on Election Day — but by then, I had already voted.
So: Why Blair? I’d genuinely like to know, and I’m probably not the only one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
1. not every non political person is Trump like, plus this is a county executive election, not a presidential one.
2. Elrich has mismanaged the county
3. Blair has been in the trenches, both as a business person and working with charities and non profits.
4. When was the last real world, non political experience Elrich had?
Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for my elderly dog over Elrich, and she shits in the house when it rains.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
1. not every non political person is Trump like, plus this is a county executive election, not a presidential one.
2. Elrich has mismanaged the county
3. Blair has been in the trenches, both as a business person and working with charities and non profits.
4. When was the last real world, non political experience Elrich had?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Why? Blair has zero government experience. He's a rich business executive who can throw money away on a vanity campaign. Kinda like . . . oh, yeah -- that guy who is now our "former president". That worked out well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't underestimate the pro-Elrich vote. His base consists of the following:
1. Labor unions
2. Socialists
3. Opponents to development (From the right and from the left, NIMBYs and tree huggers)
4. Various social justice warriors and civic activists, Takoma Park types
and now a fifth component:
Covid Karens, the "shelter forever" types who complain on Nextdoor about runners not wearing masks
Sadly I see this making up a strong plurality of the vote.
Not to direct this only at you, but this thread could be a great place to discuss reasons to vote FOR Blair — not just against Elrich. When I voted, I didn’t have the sense that Blair reached out to me with good reasons why someone like me should vote for him or for someone like him. It was great to meet him on Election Day — but by then, I had already voted.
So: Why Blair? I’d genuinely like to know, and I’m probably not the only one.
You're not the only one! I'm pretty undecided.
Anonymous wrote:I'd vote for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't underestimate the pro-Elrich vote. His base consists of the following:
1. Labor unions
2. Socialists
3. Opponents to development (From the right and from the left, NIMBYs and tree huggers)
4. Various social justice warriors and civic activists, Takoma Park types
and now a fifth component:
Covid Karens, the "shelter forever" types who complain on Nextdoor about runners not wearing masks
Sadly I see this making up a strong plurality of the vote.
Yes, landslide is probably overstating.
Elrich will get a large share of the votes. the question is, has Elrich screwed up enough to lose the 77 votes that he won by? I think that's an overwhelming yes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as those idiots on the county council (looking at you, Hans) stay out of the way, this should be a landslide for Blair.
This. JFC please no crowded field like last time.
It will be. Various council members are term-limited so next step is county exec. Riemer will run for sure. Maybe Jawando and Rice too.
I'm an unaffiliated by I may have to register as a D just to vote for Blair.