Anonymous wrote:Well, you mentioned football, basketball, and baseball.
Football and basketball absolutely not. Especially football. Those sports depend a great deal on size and natural athleticism.
Baseball probably yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a kid is quick and athletic, there's no reason they can't catch up quickly on the technical side. It just takes working with a coach with private lessons, which takes $$.
Lol wrong
Tennis is hard. My travel soccer player is working to pick it up as a second sport, and even with private lessons, it takes a lot of work and time.
Yes it is, but it's entirely on the kid to do the work, they don't have to get picked for a travel team in order to get the right level of training. If they start at age 12 coming from another sport and want to live and breath tennis for a few years and enter as many tournaments as they can, and if their parents have the funds to pay for the coaching, it's possible to improve enough to play in high school.
I have a tennis player, I know it's possible for some kids to improve so drastically in just a year that you'd think they'd been playing since they learned to walk.
If they start at age 12 coming from another sport and want to live and breath tennis for a few years and enter as many tournaments as they can, and if their parents have the funds to pay for the coaching, it's possible to improve enough to play in high school
Anonymous wrote:Most pro athletes played multiple sports before high school. There are tons of articles about it.
Anonymous wrote:If a kid is quick and athletic, there's no reason they can't catch up quickly on the technical side. It just takes working with a coach with private lessons, which takes $$.
Lol wrong
Tennis is hard. My travel soccer player is working to pick it up as a second sport, and even with private lessons, it takes a lot of work and time.
If a kid is quick and athletic, there's no reason they can't catch up quickly on the technical side. It just takes working with a coach with private lessons, which takes $$.
Lol wrong
Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a fairly athletic child who is currently interested only in the classic American sports (football, baseball, and basketball), I'm noticing that there is a push to specialize kids earlier and earlier. I'm wondering if any coaches or trainers reading this might comment on whether a kid who doesn't play a sport intensively by age 12/13 gets locked out of that sport forever?
For example, my 10-year old DS currently has no interest in lacrosse, soccer, or tennis. If he doesn't start one of these other sport by 12, does that mean he can't play them in his teens, except on a recreational basis?
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't put tennis in the same category. The difference is that it's an individual sport so you're not depending on a team or confined to a playing season. If a kid is quick and athletic, there's no reason they can't catch up quickly on the technical side. It just takes working with a coach with private lessons, which takes $$.