Anonymous wrote:If your kid is scoring way above grade level on these inventories in the fall, nothing taught in MS is going to increase it by much. Or at all. My kids always scored two or more years ahead. It would vary over the course of the year, up and down. Pre pandemic. If your kid comes into sixth grade over 1000 on math inventory, nothing they are teaching in math 6 extended is going to move him much. He’s already way ahead. And for reading, the decrease probably reflects that your kid is doing less independent reading than over the summer. The APS reading course or English 7 isn’t going to move the readings score of a high achieving kid. That’s pretty pandemic truth.
Anonymous wrote:APS loves data and studies. How about they put together a composite graph of the MS inventories from September to present? I don’t give a crap about much of the wasted conversation with the school board, but the actual education/product is what I would like to see.
They tend to hide material that doesn’t support their cause, like info they compiled which made them scrap the intensified math pathways that were failing kids they tracked from 6th-12th.
Anonymous wrote:Straight As really don’t mean much this year. They have dumbed it down so much for virtual. My kid (HS) has straight As and she’s said there’s no way she would have an A in calculus if she was in person. So take the grades with a grain of salt.
Anonymous wrote:Straight As really don’t mean much this year. They have dumbed it down so much for virtual. My kid (HS) has straight As and she’s said there’s no way she would have an A in calculus if she was in person. So take the grades with a grain of salt.
Anonymous wrote:They have not been in a classroom since March 13th- almost a year ago.
The pps weighing in are most likely from the upper SES, “advantaged households”. Imagine what the loss of learning is like for the disadvantaged and kids without support at home.
This is a nationwide crisis.
I worry about how dumbed down APS 8th grade will be next year due to the ever widening education gap in the grades. Some kids will have dropped much farther. APS always teaches to the lowest denominator- like last spring not adding new material to the curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My youngest is in 7th and this is the first time a mid-year inventory was lower as a start of school year inventory.
He’s still getting straight As, camera on and fully participates. Granted, he’s above average but seeing the results dropped a little makes me worry how behind so many kids will be and what learning will be like with many kids behind. We are going on one full year of DL March 13th.
Has APS published any data on this?
Sorry - lower than inventory at start of school year. Not drastically, but a slight drop.
For both reading & math?
Yes-7th grade.
Reading went from 1459 to 1297. Math only dropped 10 points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My youngest is in 7th and this is the first time a mid-year inventory was lower as a start of school year inventory.
He’s still getting straight As, camera on and fully participates. Granted, he’s above average but seeing the results dropped a little makes me worry how behind so many kids will be and what learning will be like with many kids behind. We are going on one full year of DL March 13th.
Has APS published any data on this?
Sorry - lower than inventory at start of school year. Not drastically, but a slight drop.
For both reading & math?