Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:follow the money. a lot of pro-lockdown organizations in the funders of both the study and the chalkbeat group.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/pages/supporters
https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php
While chalkbeat is a useless, one-sided, poorly-written union blog, I’m not sure what you’re saying about USC. But anyway, chalkbeat is so transparent here. “A plurality want all DL! This is evidence that we should continue in DL! Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the majority would like some in-person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly inflammatory opinion: many of the same bipoc families reporting that they do not plan on sending their kids back to school are the same families whose kids aren’t doing well. It’s not “working for them” per se.
If you don’t value education, why would you send your kid into if if you didn’t have to and there is any risk? If you don’t care that they fail out, that makes logical sense. My best friends class - it’s a title 1 school - the kids whose families already picked distance learning have kids who aren’t attending or doing any work a year. She says she’s not sure what’s she’s going to do when hybrid starts and none of her CDL kids show up to afternoon session (it’s CDL in afternoon).
If this was true, then how do you explain Asian families choosing distance learning in large numbers? They are more likely than Latino or black students to choose to remain in DL and also have higher scores than pretty much any demographic group.
I really do think it’s about housing and the existence of elederly/immune compromised in a household with kids. That’s not prevalent among white Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly inflammatory opinion: many of the same bipoc families reporting that they do not plan on sending their kids back to school are the same families whose kids aren’t doing well. It’s not “working for them” per se.
If you don’t value education, why would you send your kid into if if you didn’t have to and there is any risk? If you don’t care that they fail out, that makes logical sense. My best friends class - it’s a title 1 school - the kids whose families already picked distance learning have kids who aren’t attending or doing any work a year. She says she’s not sure what’s she’s going to do when hybrid starts and none of her CDL kids show up to afternoon session (it’s CDL in afternoon).
If this was true, then how do you explain Asian families choosing distance learning in large numbers? They are more likely than Latino or black students to choose to remain in DL and also have higher scores than pretty much any demographic group.
I really do think it’s about housing and the existence of elederly/immune compromised in a household with kids. That’s not prevalent among white Americans.
Bipoc doesn't include Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Highly inflammatory opinion: many of the same bipoc families reporting that they do not plan on sending their kids back to school are the same families whose kids aren’t doing well. It’s not “working for them” per se.
If you don’t value education, why would you send your kid into if if you didn’t have to and there is any risk? If you don’t care that they fail out, that makes logical sense. My best friends class - it’s a title 1 school - the kids whose families already picked distance learning have kids who aren’t attending or doing any work a year. She says she’s not sure what’s she’s going to do when hybrid starts and none of her CDL kids show up to afternoon session (it’s CDL in afternoon).
If this was true, then how do you explain Asian families choosing distance learning in large numbers? They are more likely than Latino or black students to choose to remain in DL and also have higher scores than pretty much any demographic group.
I really do think it’s about housing and the existence of elederly/immune compromised in a household with kids. That’s not prevalent among white Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Highly inflammatory opinion: many of the same bipoc families reporting that they do not plan on sending their kids back to school are the same families whose kids aren’t doing well. It’s not “working for them” per se.
If you don’t value education, why would you send your kid into if if you didn’t have to and there is any risk? If you don’t care that they fail out, that makes logical sense. My best friends class - it’s a title 1 school - the kids whose families already picked distance learning have kids who aren’t attending or doing any work a year. She says she’s not sure what’s she’s going to do when hybrid starts and none of her CDL kids show up to afternoon session (it’s CDL in afternoon).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not a good idea to make educational policy based on what people want. This can often be in conflict with what children need.
Opinion polling is a bad way to make good policy.
+1,000,000.
And not just educational policy.
Anonymous wrote:It is not a good idea to make educational policy based on what people want. This can often be in conflict with what children need.
Opinion polling is a bad way to make good policy.
Anonymous wrote:It's a pretty well known fact that the loudest people with the biggest wallets are going to be the most vocal. #openFCPS and its equivalent around the country are very representative of that fact. DCUM is 99% rich white women posting so OF COURSE that's who is going to be vocal on this board. In real life, most of the people I know are fine with DL. They don't love it, it's not ideal, of course they'd like kids to be back in school, but most people I've talked to would prefer 5 days in school to 100% DL to hybrid in that order.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:follow the money. a lot of pro-lockdown organizations in the funders of both the study and the chalkbeat group.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/pages/supporters
https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php
While chalkbeat is a useless, one-sided, poorly-written union blog, I’m not sure what you’re saying about USC. But anyway, chalkbeat is so transparent here. “A plurality want all DL! This is evidence that we should continue in DL! Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the majority would like some in-person?
yea sorry the USC link didnt work, have to click COVID 19 then click SPONSORS, couldnt link directly. Gates Foundation interestingly one of the common funders between them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:follow the money. a lot of pro-lockdown organizations in the funders of both the study and the chalkbeat group.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/pages/supporters
https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php
While chalkbeat is a useless, one-sided, poorly-written union blog, I’m not sure what you’re saying about USC. But anyway, chalkbeat is so transparent here. “A plurality want all DL! This is evidence that we should continue in DL! Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the majority would like some in-person?
Anonymous wrote:follow the money. a lot of pro-lockdown organizations in the funders of both the study and the chalkbeat group.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/pages/supporters
https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php
Anonymous wrote:follow the money. a lot of pro-lockdown organizations in the funders of both the study and the chalkbeat group.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/pages/supporters
https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php