Anonymous wrote:What about people with disabilities? How will they get around the ADA?

LOL. What part of GOP vote rigging seems like they care about people or stupid little things like laws?

I personally think it's awesome they are going to prevent old white people from voting if they don't have enough strength to stand in lines for a day at the polls. Which you don't, if you spend all your time watching Fox news all day. ~fellow white person

What about people with disabilities? How will they get around the ADA?

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to explain how restricting absentee voting to those who actually qualify constitutes "cheating."

This is exactly how it was in VA for years.

Someone needs to explain why you think it’s necessary to “restrict absentee voting,” or why one would need to “actually qualify” for it, at all.

Anonymous wrote:GOP Governor.
GOP Sec State.

Both were emphatic throughout the 2020 cycle as to the integrity of their systems and process and the overall results.

And yet, somehow...

...they didn’t like the outcome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to explain how restricting absentee voting to those who actually qualify constitutes "cheating."

This is exactly how it was in VA for years.

When you get to pick your voters, yes, that’s cheating. Anti-democratic cheating.

I’ll say it again, for the thick souls who only pretend they like democracy: when you get to pick your voters, that’s cheating.

+1. Voter suppression clear as day. We want to make it harder for people who want to vote for the other guy.

Actually, any attempt to make voting harder is more likely to hurt the party that relies on lower-income, younger voters who are also likelier to have hourly jobs. Undoubtedly, some white Republicans will also be hurt by this, but on balance the Republican party will come out ahead.

I think this distinction is important, because saying that they are "picking their voters" puts the bar higher on proving harm. They are making it harder to vote. Why should any American be okay with this?

This will go to SCOTUS and be overturned.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to explain how restricting absentee voting to those who actually qualify constitutes "cheating."

This is exactly how it was in VA for years.

When you get to pick your voters, yes, that’s cheating. Anti-democratic cheating.

I’ll say it again, for the thick souls who only pretend they like democracy: when you get to pick your voters, that’s cheating.

+1. Voter suppression clear as day. We want to make it harder for people who want to vote for the other guy.

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to explain how restricting absentee voting to those who actually qualify constitutes "cheating."

This is exactly how it was in VA for years.

When you get to pick your voters, yes, that’s cheating. Anti-democratic cheating.

I’ll say it again, for the thick souls who only pretend they like democracy: when you get to pick your voters, that’s cheating.

GOP Governor.
GOP Sec State.

Both were emphatic throughout the 2020 cycle as to the integrity of their systems and process and the overall results.

And yet, somehow...

Then GA should also make voting day a day off so people can go vote. But, they won't because then poor people might vote more.

Funny, GA ballots were recounted multiple times, and those recounts showed that the original count was valid.

IOW, there was nothing nefarious in Georgia.

Also, more Democrat states should just move to mail-only voting. Get rid of the voting booths - massive waste of money and resources

Anonymous wrote:Someone needs to explain how restricting absentee voting to those who actually qualify constitutes "cheating."

This is exactly how it was in VA for years.

It is one of the ways to reduce voter turnout.

This basically forces Democrats to remove the filibuster in the Senate. This will need to pass the “For the People” voting rights legislation with less than 60 votes.

It is what it is.