Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

We know. Entitled “progressive” white people love it when one a-hole says and does the thing they are all thinking but don’t want to say out loud or actually do themselves.

I'm tiring of this disgusting racist argument that has been promoted by white teachers.

Thank you for sharing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

We know. Entitled “progressive” white people love it when one a-hole says and does the thing they are all thinking but don’t want to say out loud or actually do themselves.

I'm tiring of this disgusting racist argument that has been promoted by white teachers.

If this lawsuit improves the accountability from APS, it’s fine. Right now, the schools board and Duran have not shown any accountability to the parents. All this money and time wasted and we get the lovely concurrent model. This is not “ high quality “ education.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening



Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.

The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.

His lawsuit isn't about equal access to education, it's about access to a "high quality" education. Either way, though, it's going nowhere. For him to prevail on getting schools to reopen, he would need to prove not only that the virtual schooling provided by APS does not qualify as "high quality," but that APS in fact cannot provide virtual schooling, in whatever form that meets the standard of "high quality." Otherwise, the appropriate remedy is simply to require that APS improve its virtual learning option to meet the constitutional standard for "high quality."

The consequence of a ruling that virtual learning cannot qualify as "high quality" would be that Virtual Virginia would have to be complete shut down, and the Virginia courts aren't going to do that.

Anonymous wrote:If school systems fail to follow the new CDC guidelines for middle and high school opening, can they be sued if a teen gets COVID and has some sort permanent disability or death as a result. Or will it be OK because Northam asked all schools to have re-opening plans by March 15? Looking for thoughts from DCUM lawyers.

Just homeschool your kid. Honestly the liability culture is ridiculous and exactly why schools haven’t opened I. Earnest until now

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

Ew.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening



Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.

The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.

I don't think the parent will win, but equal access doesn't me the same access, which is what you're calling equal.

There's an active investigation against FCPS for failing to provide FAPE because buildings were open for SRS kids (which cost) but not for SPED kids.

Which is just dumb because SRS is a county program and has nothing to do with the school district.

Do you mean it’s a Fairfax county GOVERNMENT program? In this case (just like SACC) the FC government rents the space in the FCPS buildings. To this day it amazes me that people still don’t know this about SACC and continue to complain to the school about not getting a spot, or why isn’t it open in every school. Two completely different entities SRS(now)/SACC (normally) is not a FCPS program.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

We know. Entitled “progressive” white people love it when one a-hole says and does the thing they are all thinking but don’t want to say out loud or actually do themselves.

Oh the irony - A-holes like you take a jab at concerned parents whenever possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

We know. Entitled “progressive” white people love it when one a-hole says and does the thing they are all thinking but don’t want to say out loud or actually do themselves.

Anonymous wrote:APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

As an APS parent, I appreciate him and his boldness.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening



Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.

The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.

I don't think the parent will win, but equal access doesn't me the same access, which is what you're calling equal.

There's an active investigation against FCPS for failing to provide FAPE because buildings were open for SRS kids (which cost) but not for SPED kids.

Which is just dumb because SRS is a county program and has nothing to do with the school district.

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening

Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.



The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.



I don't think the parent will win, but equal access doesn't me the same access, which is what you're calling equal.



There's an active investigation against FCPS for failing to provide FAPE because buildings were open for SRS kids (which cost) but not for SPED kids.

What does SRS stand for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening



Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.

The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.

I don't think the parent will win, but equal access doesn't me the same access, which is what you're calling equal.

There's an active investigation against FCPS for failing to provide FAPE because buildings were open for SRS kids (which cost) but not for SPED kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
APS already has one dumbbutt who is suing it for violating his daughter's constitutional rights by not opening



Following SF's lead. I wouldn't say that he's wrong.

The constitution ensures equal access to education. Since all students are learning from a distance, they are all getting equal access.

I don't think the parent will win, but equal access doesn't me the same access, which is what you're calling equal.

The parent won’t win but in our country you can basically sue a school system for anything. All districts have at least one litigious parent who sues them repeatedly for fun.