Anonymous wrote:This is a tough thread to read.
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t new. It’s why the adea was enacted. My father was a professional with over 30 years at a company in the late 80s—they pushed out all the people over 55 at the site in my hometown by telling them they had to take a RIf package or they would be moved to an incredibly remote location. I knew so many people with fathers laid off or who had to relocate. They replaced my father with a guy in his 20s who did not know how to do the work at all.
Incidentally, that company then started to spiral downwards and is a shadow of its former self.
Anonymous wrote:
... and then can't find another job. Seriously, this is messed up. Gone are the days companies keep someone until they are 60, much less 65.
Yes, people can consult, but then there's no healthcare.
Medicare needs to start at 60, no later.
Anonymous wrote:Banking. We just cleared out everyone 55+. Generous buyouts. But, we can replace 250k boomers with 75k millennials and even when we only get 2 yrs it makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:Banking. We just cleared out everyone 55+. Generous buyouts. But, we can replace 250k boomers with 75k millennials and even when we only get 2 yrs it makes sense.