Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess so much for the Americans “2nd chance”, just as long as it is not impacting me and not in my backyard.
When you are accepting a few kids and have ton of applicants, not having killed someone seems like a fair first cut. I’d rather forgive a B- in algebra than beating a parent to death if I have to choose one
Anonymous wrote:I guess so much for the Americans “2nd chance”, just as long as it is not impacting me and not in my backyard.
Anonymous wrote:I guess so much for the Americans “2nd chance”, just as long as it is not impacting me and not in my backyard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tuft university accepted a student who murdered her own mother many years ago: https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/11/us/for-student-who-killed-her-mother-acceptance.html
Good for Tuft university for doing the right thing. Shame on Harvard and Columbia.
Hold up. It wasn’t “many years ago.” This girl beat her mother to death with a candlestick at age 14. The court called this murder and sentenced her to 8 months in juvy. She claimed her mother was an alcoholic that could sometimes be abusive...but bludgeoning someone to death is just not an acceptable response for a 14 year old in any circumstance. The article has such a lean that it even lists Tufts as “her only remaining option,” like this girl couldn’t have applied to a thousand other colleges. Not so sure I would want her as my daughter’s roommate.
Anonymous wrote:Tuft university accepted a student who murdered her own mother many years ago: https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/11/us/for-student-who-killed-her-mother-acceptance.html
Good for Tuft university for doing the right thing. Shame on Harvard and Columbia.
Anonymous wrote:As the victim of a crime perpetuated by a minor, I certainly hope so.
Because the EEOC guidance says to take into account the conviction and the job. Your examples are relevant to the job (and banking has specific regulations). But someone who was convicted of writing bad checks 6 years ago and you now don’t want to hire them for a software developer role? That is what the regulations are looking out for. It’s also why there are statute of limitations regarding asking candidates about convictions and pulling that information in a background check.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well there are laws preventing the use of convictions to deny someone employment, so why not college?Anonymous wrote:Colleges can deny people for just about any reason: probably not straight-up their race but that's about it. Some schools can discriminate based on sex or religion. Of course they can take a criminal consideration into account. You think someone's going to be successful in saying "yeah I know I murdered a couple of people but my SATs are above average"?
Not that I'm aware of. There are laws requiring the criminal background check to be deferred until after the interview and the like, but there's no law that a day care has to hire a child molester or a pharmacy has to hire a drug dealer or that a bank has to hire a check kiter.