Anonymous wrote:This is going to be terrible for those people who are expected to return in person. It’s equivalent to not showing up on the first day of school . The people assigned to virtual had nothing to lose or gain by voting but helped seal the fate for the others. I feel bad for my fellow union members, Liz Davis spends too much time on her soapbox and doesn’t adequately inform the membership.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a bad play for WTU. I'm pro union in general, but you have to play your cards better than this. You're going to lose what little parental support you have left.
It’s odd that parents on this forum think this. They have tons of parent support, just less from white ones or the more wealthy ones.
Anonymous wrote:This is a bad play for WTU. I'm pro union in general, but you have to play your cards better than this. You're going to lose what little parental support you have left.
Anonymous wrote:Did an actual decision come from arbitration yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were fools to believe this Feb 1 plan was actually happening.
Really? Because teachers were playing along. Pretty awful to mislead kids like this. They’ve been gearing up for weeks at this point. WTU should have decided this at least two weeks ago. What jerks. And I’m someone who gave up on the idea of in person school until next year, and was fine with it!
+1 and I would add my kids teachers were enthusiastically playing along. Nevertheless I prepared my kid for the possibility it may not happen. But to say the kids will feel mislead by the teachers is absolutely correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were fools to believe this Feb 1 plan was actually happening.
Really? Because teachers were playing along. Pretty awful to mislead kids like this. They’ve been gearing up for weeks at this point. WTU should have decided this at least two weeks ago. What jerks. And I’m someone who gave up on the idea of in person school until next year, and was fine with it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were fools to believe this Feb 1 plan was actually happening.
Really? Because teachers were playing along. Pretty awful to mislead kids like this. They’ve been gearing up for weeks at this point. WTU should have decided this at least two weeks ago. What jerks. And I’m someone who gave up on the idea of in person school until next year, and was fine with it!
Huh No one has been gearing up? Also the WTU has stated from the beginning they were against in person for term 3. Why in heaven's name are you surprised and outraged about?
My kids classes have been rearranged. The in school kids have been assigned. My kid had introductory meetings with her new teachers and classmates. We have a new schedule. Yes, they were gearing up.
+1 my child had multiple days of instruction cancelled for the teacher to prepare for in-person. My school was absolutely preparing for it. I still think feb 1 will happen, but admit I’m an unrelenting optimist and could very much be wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were fools to believe this Feb 1 plan was actually happening.
Really? Because teachers were playing along. Pretty awful to mislead kids like this. They’ve been gearing up for weeks at this point. WTU should have decided this at least two weeks ago. What jerks. And I’m someone who gave up on the idea of in person school until next year, and was fine with it!
Huh No one has been gearing up? Also the WTU has stated from the beginning they were against in person for term 3. Why in heaven's name are you surprised and outraged about?
My kids classes have been rearranged. The in school kids have been assigned. My kid had introductory meetings with her new teachers and classmates. We have a new schedule. Yes, they were gearing up.