Anonymous wrote:
A few things:
1. In elementary, kids should get all As. It's that easy. So if there are Bs, you need to figure out if she's missing content,
or inattentive, or just blowing things off out of childish glee.
2. Expectations and resilience: that's something she needs to learn and can be talked into. She needs to accept that things are worthwhile to do even though they may be confusing and strange.
3. MAP tests are wonderful. They are adaptive, meaning they adjust the level of questions depending on how the student answers the previous ones. The user interface is also much better than with some other standardized tests out there!
Conclusion: it sounds as if she needs to buckle down. 4th grade is when school kicks up a notch, so weaknesses that may have been invisible before may start showing: either academic ones or behavioral ones (such as inattentive ADHD and low processing speed).
Anonymous wrote:Just to give you perspective, MCPS in MD has been using MAP testing for years and it's been a great experience. Kids and parents like it much better than the recently retired and horrible PARCC testing, because it's easier to navigate. additionally, MAP gives the school and families a color report that provides state and county results along with the student's school results, and normed percentile ranges of the student's score. The test begins where the student left off during the last test, and keeps records from previous years. For the reading comprehension, MAP also give a Lexile range so children can pick books most adapted to their level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to give you perspective, MCPS in MD has been using MAP testing for years and it's been a great experience. Kids and parents like it much better than the recently retired and horrible PARCC testing, because it's easier to navigate. additionally, MAP gives the school and families a color report that provides state and county results along with the student's school results, and normed percentile ranges of the student's score. The test begins where the student left off during the last test, and keeps records from previous years. For the reading comprehension, MAP also give a Lexile range so children can pick books most adapted to their level.
MAP didn't replace PARCC, MCAP did. MAP is a different category of test.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks all. There is definitely some performance anxiety at play with her, NOT parent induced. Child one is totally go with the flow. I did not in any way wish to sit with her view the test, I only did once she became upset and was crying.
I have opted her out of further map testing for the year.
Anonymous wrote:Just to give you perspective, MCPS in MD has been using MAP testing for years and it's been a great experience. Kids and parents like it much better than the recently retired and horrible PARCC testing, because it's easier to navigate. additionally, MAP gives the school and families a color report that provides state and county results along with the student's school results, and normed percentile ranges of the student's score. The test begins where the student left off during the last test, and keeps records from previous years. For the reading comprehension, MAP also give a Lexile range so children can pick books most adapted to their level.
Anonymous wrote:Which district is this? I teach grade 3 and I’m not familiar with MAP testing.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks all. There is definitely some performance anxiety at play with her, NOT parent induced. Child one is totally go with the flow. I did not in any way wish to sit with her view the test, I only did once she became upset and was crying.
I have opted her out of further map testing for the year.