Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Piano legs maybe?
I have a friend that really has a lower leg that is the same length to foot. No defined ankle. She is tall and thin. They are piano legs. With flats it looks kind of weird.
Cankles are more like no defined ankle but also chubby.
I have very defined, tinier ankles. I get compliments on my legs a lot. The downside is I overturn my ankles fairly easily.
Cankles aren't about weight--it's just that there's no slimming at the ankle. So your friend has cankles. Same thing as piano legs.
Anonymous wrote:Piano legs maybe?
I have a friend that really has a lower leg that is the same length to foot. No defined ankle. She is tall and thin. They are piano legs. With flats it looks kind of weird.
Cankles are more like no defined ankle but also chubby.
I have very defined, tinier ankles. I get compliments on my legs a lot. The downside is I overturn my ankles fairly easily.
Anonymous wrote:NO
to those saying yes, absolutely shame on you
You have a strong leg but very defined ankles.
So
NO CANKLES
Anonymous wrote:Yes you do. I don't see clean cut ankle definition.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t have cankles! Also, why do women point these things out? Had anyone ever looked at a man and criticized his ankles?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of, but I think that's mostly a part of being overweight. It's not a "true" cankle where you would have it at 110 lbs and 5'6, more like legs just chunked up all over so lost some ankle definition.
Who at 5’6, 110 lbs has cankles? I’m similar, and I can wrap my fingers around my ankle, but my calves are much larger from weight lifting and run/bike/hike activities.
I’m a PP who doesn’t think OP has cankles. I know people with true cankles, front butts, and multiple chins. BMI’s 35-40+