Anonymous wrote:I don't understand. The GLS starts at about the same price as the X7. If you are fancy enough for the X7, you are fancy enough for the GLS. The Q7 is cheaper but that's because, well, it's an Audi.
You should absolutely look at a GLS, in Diamond White.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:is an X-7 midsized? I thought the 3 was small sized, 5 was mid and 7 was large
OP is ignorant and you are right. The X5 is the mid-size; the X7 is the full-size.
Also, only on DCUM does someone describe themselves as “not fancy,” but talks about considering a $75K vehicle.
FWIW, DH has the X5 and loves it. I have a fully loaded Lincoln Corsair and love it (I know the Corsair gets hate on this forum, but it really is awesome).
LOL, this is OP. Ignorant as charged. I guess I'm not as car-savvy as all you people! I think of vehicles like the Tahoe, Suburban, Lincoln Navigator, Toyota Land Cruiser, etc. as full-size. What are those? SUPER-full sized? SUPER-DUPER Full Sized?
In any case, thanks for all the helpful feedback about what an idiot I am for not feeling fancy enough for Mercedes. I guess I just view the brand as much flashier than BMW or Audi. But I will definitely take your opinions to heart.
Mercedes is doing a much better job designing their cars as of late. You are right to think that a MB generally looks more glamorous than an equivalent BMW. Seriously, go check out a GLS, or a GLE if you want something smaller. Remember, Diamond White.
I am actually a fan of BMW, having owed a few of their straight six and turbo six cars throughout the years, but they have been really disappointing in the past 10 years or so. We bought our first Mercedes in 2013 and we are on our third one. MB is really pushing the boundaries of what a mass market brand can sell with cars like the GT and the G Wagen. The interior is especially fancy with their ambient lighting. Test drive one at night, it's like a dance club in there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These cars and SUVs are pits of money. Parts are so expensive compared to Toyotas and Hondas. I guess people are stupid.
Or we don’t want to drive around in some plastic car?
I do not know the x7, but I generally do not like bmw. I have a GLS, and they are really nice. Way nicer than the Q7. Not sure if your price point, but I like the XC90 better than the Q7. The interior of the GLS blows the others away though. GLE is priced mid to upper 60s if you are looking for midsize. I wouldn’t consider the Q7 midsize.
plastic is exactly what comes to mind when I think of land cruisers (the Toyota equivalent to these cars)
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand. The GLS starts at about the same price as the X7. If you are fancy enough for the X7, you are fancy enough for the GLS. The Q7 is cheaper but that's because, well, it's an Audi.
You should absolutely look at a GLS, in Diamond White.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:is an X-7 midsized? I thought the 3 was small sized, 5 was mid and 7 was large
OP is ignorant and you are right. The X5 is the mid-size; the X7 is the full-size.
Also, only on DCUM does someone describe themselves as “not fancy,” but talks about considering a $75K vehicle.
FWIW, DH has the X5 and loves it. I have a fully loaded Lincoln Corsair and love it (I know the Corsair gets hate on this forum, but it really is awesome).
LOL, this is OP. Ignorant as charged. I guess I'm not as car-savvy as all you people! I think of vehicles like the Tahoe, Suburban, Lincoln Navigator, Toyota Land Cruiser, etc. as full-size. What are those? SUPER-full sized? SUPER-DUPER Full Sized?
In any case, thanks for all the helpful feedback about what an idiot I am for not feeling fancy enough for Mercedes. I guess I just view the brand as much flashier than BMW or Audi. But I will definitely take your opinions to heart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:is an X-7 midsized? I thought the 3 was small sized, 5 was mid and 7 was large
OP is ignorant and you are right. The X5 is the mid-size; the X7 is the full-size.
Also, only on DCUM does someone describe themselves as “not fancy,” but talks about considering a $75K vehicle.
FWIW, DH has the X5 and loves it. I have a fully loaded Lincoln Corsair and love it (I know the Corsair gets hate on this forum, but it really is awesome).
LOL, this is OP. Ignorant as charged. I guess I'm not as car-savvy as all you people! I think of vehicles like the Tahoe, Suburban, Lincoln Navigator, Toyota Land Cruiser, etc. as full-size. What are those? SUPER-full sized? SUPER-DUPER Full Sized?
In any case, thanks for all the helpful feedback about what an idiot I am for not feeling fancy enough for Mercedes. I guess I just view the brand as much flashier than BMW or Audi. But I will definitely take your opinions to heart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:is an X-7 midsized? I thought the 3 was small sized, 5 was mid and 7 was large
OP is ignorant and you are right. The X5 is the mid-size; the X7 is the full-size.
Also, only on DCUM does someone describe themselves as “not fancy,” but talks about considering a $75K vehicle.
FWIW, DH has the X5 and loves it. I have a fully loaded Lincoln Corsair and love it (I know the Corsair gets hate on this forum, but it really is awesome).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These cars and SUVs are pits of money. Parts are so expensive compared to Toyotas and Hondas. I guess people are stupid.
Or we don’t want to drive around in some plastic car?
I do not know the x7, but I generally do not like bmw. I have a GLS, and they are really nice. Way nicer than the Q7. Not sure if your price point, but I like the XC90 better than the Q7. The interior of the GLS blows the others away though. GLE is priced mid to upper 60s if you are looking for midsize. I wouldn’t consider the Q7 midsize.
plastic is exactly what comes to mind when I think of land cruisers (the Toyota equivalent to these cars)