Anonymous wrote:He's placating all the return-to-schoolers and a week into January he'll roll it all back again, to placate the stay-homers. Everyone is happy for a while and unhappy for a while. FCCPS is small but there's still no way to responsibly make this happens with the cases rising and so soon after the holidays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
This has been explained. Did you miss it and want to hear? Or do you just not care about explanations?
Because your superintendent is a tool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree that today’s email is so hard to understand and seems contradictory. I wish Noonan could keep it more to the point. Today’s email is more convoluted than most and that is really saying something.
Ha ha. He reminds me of me. I can’t help a bit of meandering in my writing so I end up bolding what I think are the essential points/ directives of a letter.
What might be confusing you is that he is taking the tack of extreme honesty, acknowledging some serious hiccups in the plan to return to school - namely, a shortage of custodial staff since a recent outbreak among them. He carefully worded this section, of course, so as to NOT acknowledge this happened during school hours and on school property.
In essence, he is saying “We shall charge forth anyway to reopen school, armed with our CDC approved ‘mitigation’ efforts.”
He then adds a couple of pointers for parents so as to optimize said mitigation methods: Don’t come to school sick and If you traveled over the break, wait a couple of weeks before coming in. (Guess that directive probably doesn’t apply to teachers).
I must say he has a lot of hutzpah to send EVERYONE back two weeks after an occupancy of probably 10 to a building arguably led to a staff “outbreak”... of course, I am sure all the custodians caught the virus at a mutually attended holiday soiree and NOT at work *cough cough*
What is your basis for saying there was a staff outbreak? If there was one positive (the way I read it) anyone who came in contact would be in quarantine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
Your job per Fcps mandates that you are within driving distance.. sorry (not) that you have to move out of the beach/lake whatever..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree that today’s email is so hard to understand and seems contradictory. I wish Noonan could keep it more to the point. Today’s email is more convoluted than most and that is really saying something.
Ha ha. He reminds me of me. I can’t help a bit of meandering in my writing so I end up bolding what I think are the essential points/ directives of a letter.
What might be confusing you is that he is taking the tack of extreme honesty, acknowledging some serious hiccups in the plan to return to school - namely, a shortage of custodial staff since a recent outbreak among them. He carefully worded this section, of course, so as to NOT acknowledge this happened during school hours and on school property.
In essence, he is saying “We shall charge forth anyway to reopen school, armed with our CDC approved ‘mitigation’ efforts.”
He then adds a couple of pointers for parents so as to optimize said mitigation methods: Don’t come to school sick and If you traveled over the break, wait a couple of weeks before coming in. (Guess that directive probably doesn’t apply to teachers).
I must say he has a lot of hutzpah to send EVERYONE back two weeks after an occupancy of probably 10 to a building arguably led to a staff “outbreak”... of course, I am sure all the custodians caught the virus at a mutually attended holiday soiree and NOT at work *cough cough*
Anonymous wrote:Now for APS. Let’s go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what to say when closely adhering to cdc guidelines is viewed as ‘crazy’
Welcome yo America!
Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what to say when closely adhering to cdc guidelines is viewed as ‘crazy’
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Staff have been notified that they must all report and work from the building’s beginning January 4th. FCCPS should be encouraging everyone to stay home and keep numbers down. Teachers must now teach from school, even while students remain virtual. This is one of the most irresponsible decisions they have made. Why force teachers to come in when students are not there?
This has been explained. Did you miss it and want to hear? Or do you just not care about explanations?
Anonymous wrote:I agree that today’s email is so hard to understand and seems contradictory. I wish Noonan could keep it more to the point. Today’s email is more convoluted than most and that is really saying something.