Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There were probably around 10% that were center eligible from our Title 1 school. Now, if they're going to use school norms of presumably less than 132, there will be many more.
Ah I see so center parents are freaking out.
Anonymous wrote:There were probably around 10% that were center eligible from our Title 1 school. Now, if they're going to use school norms of presumably less than 132, there will be many more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either pay up to attend a good aap program or you get what you deserve. No more free rides gaming the system by attending poorly rated schools at a discount.
What the hell does this even mean? Level IV is decided through a central committee.
Not sure, maybe they're suggesting that some AAP pyramids are more watered down and not very good/competitive compared to others (Longfellow, Carson).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either pay up to attend a good aap program or you get what you deserve. No more free rides gaming the system by attending poorly rated schools at a discount.
What the hell does this even mean? Level IV is decided through a central committee.
Anonymous wrote:Either pay up to attend a good aap program or you get what you deserve. No more free rides gaming the system by attending poorly rated schools at a discount.
Anonymous wrote:Either pay up to attend a good aap program or you get what you deserve. No more free rides gaming the system by attending poorly rated schools at a discount.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just looked up Bull Run. Wow, I have never seen a center ranked a 4 in great schools before. That’s bad.
Our center in western Fairfax is also rated a 4. Does that mean their 2nd graders will get in while other feeder schools' kids will be held to a higher standard?
Doesn’t this already happen at schools where there is a Level IV program? From what I understand kids in Level III can be “principal placed” into the Level IV classroom which principals do to make their classroom numbers work, whether it’s a center or a local level IV. The system was already inequitable for kids whose school has no level IV, and have no chance to be principal placed. We won’t really know the extent that this proposed change will be different than the status quote until there are more details.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just looked up Bull Run. Wow, I have never seen a center ranked a 4 in great schools before. That’s bad.
Our center in western Fairfax is also rated a 4. Does that mean their 2nd graders will get in while other feeder schools' kids will be held to a higher standard?