Anonymous wrote:State schools. Because there is no grade inflation. They don't give a damn.
Anonymous wrote:This is tracked pretty well at gradeinflation.com
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really question Duke’s academics being characterized as grueling and I wonder if JHU feels that way if you’re not in a STEM field (or maybe specifically premed). Great school for an academically-inclined undergrad in humanities/social sciences, imo.
Princeton has the potential for rigor (if that’s what you’re looking for) — mandatory junior paper and senior thesis can be challenging. But Princeton, like Harvard, has lots of faculty who typically grade on a truncated scale so you have to do something pretty egregious to get a C (in a non-STEM field).
I want to Hopkins a long time ago (‘93) in social sciences and it was certainly a place it required a lot of work but I can’t imagine that much more so than other peer schools. Engineering/BME/premed kids had to work like crazy though and had to constantly deal with “the curve” which contributed to the grueling atmosphere of the place.
Anonymous wrote:I went to Cornell, NYU and Duke, and in my experience, NYU was the most rigorous, by a wide margin. Had a great experience at each school, though.
Anonymous wrote:Why are you even asking this question. It seems pointless. And like someone already said - it is very major dependent. You can be an English major at MIT and it probably isn’t especially grueling compared to some other schools