Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Why would they not do it? I thought a lot of people in the troops were republican.

Pay more attention.

^

The troops are really not a monolith.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Why would they not do it? I thought a lot of people in the troops were republican.

Pay more attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Why would they not do it? I thought a lot of people in the troops were republican.

Sounds like Trump wants the troops out of Afghanistan now so he can brag he brought them all home. Security situation be damned.

Anonymous wrote:It seems to me it's no accident that Trump refuses to authorize the transition process while at the same time is installing loyalists in key positions. And his AG has changed a decades-old policy to investigate "voter fraud" before the states certify their elections.

Too obvious?

He's angry and exacting vengeance against perceived enemies makes him feel better right now. He may be installing loyalists in the unlikely event legal challenges somehow manage to overturn the election results, but nobody really thinks that will happen. If it did, and Americans revolted, he'd have everything in place to tamp it down. But, again, noone really thinks any of this will actually come to pass.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/10/pentagon-top-policy-official-resigns-435693


At least he was allowed to resign. But he will be replaced by the loyalist extremist Tata.

He is Bumble.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Of course, they will. No one seemed to have any problems dispersing peaceful protestors using force, just a couple of months ago.

They learned from that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Lol like you know?????

Yes, I know, as does anyone paying attention. The troops are on this, they're prepared to follow legal orders and to disobey illegal orders.

What a miserable CiC we have, to bring our military to this point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Of course, they will. No one seemed to have any problems dispersing peaceful protestors using force, just a couple of months ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

Lol like you know?????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who understands these roles is shooting red flares. I don't understand why our media isn't up to the task to educate people as to what is happening.

It's not as controversial as defund the police. So the media does not really care.

It's a simple as the average person isn't familiar with these names or these positions or what role they have in the government, so they wouldn't tune into say, CNN talking about it. Media is a business. What's newsworthy to them is what generates viewers and clicks.

People who can understand and discuss these types of things (myself not included) aren't tuning into Rachel Maddow.

Anonymous wrote:Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

The troops won't do it. Do that's moot.

It seems to me it's no accident that Trump refuses to authorize the transition process while at the same time is installing loyalists in key positions. And his AG has changed a decades-old policy to investigate "voter fraud" before the states certify their elections.

Too obvious?

Can Tata command troops to support Trump in a coup of force?

Is that what is being put forth in this thread?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who understands these roles is shooting red flares. I don't understand why our media isn't up to the task to educate people as to what is happening.

It's not as controversial as defund the police. So the media does not really care.

The media is owned by people who benefit immensely from fascism. The media does not care. The media just wants more money.

They’re risking make people who are already “poor” hate money’s power when unequally distributed because of their obsession with it at the expense of security. They’re worried about communism and Marxism and all of this crap and they’re being complicit promulgates. Wag the dog and he may turn around and bite your hand off.