Anonymous wrote:Funny all this talk of fairness when your parents are alive and, from what it sounds like, well.
Personally, I don’t see the reason you shouldn’t pay your sister “top dollar” for a valued house she doesn’t want to be part of. What your children get for inheritance has nothing to do with you, or your sister. You don’t get more value of the house because you produced offspring.
I’m wondering about why you feel the need to tattle on your sister now... about what? You want the house, you pay for it, Period.
As far as your sister talking about your help with tuition, etc... tread carefully. It may be that your parents are hinting that they do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am confused. Do you think your sister should just give you her portion of the house? Of course you should pay fair market value
Yes of course I would buy her out at fair market value if we kept the house... however her version of FMV is not going to be what the appraisal comes in at, knowing her she will think we can get more if we were to actually sell it vs. just what it’s worth.
Gosh, op, you have an answer for everything. If you really think this is going to be that difficult, then just sell the house and find another house for your family. If your sister doesn't agree with the appraisal, then have three real estate agents come in and tell you both what they think the house would sell for and have them bring comps in the area. Plus, think about it from her perspective, if your kids are getting a lot of money in trusts, are you really going to quibble with her over a few thousand dollars on a house. That is what it seems like. Perhaps you can use this as a way to get her to not contest the amounts given to your kids (which seems like a bizarre thing for an aunt to do). Tell her that you will agree to a reasonable buy out price for the summer house if she drops her complaint about your kids. Although hopefully your parents lawyer had them put something in the will that says that if any beneficiary contests the will, they get nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell your sister that you are clueless how the will is structured and that it's solely up to your parents to decide. Maybe she will piss off your parents and they will cut her out. We have four children and ten grandchildren but one of our kids doesn't have any children. We have set up well funded 529's for each grandchild but our kid without kids would make a big mistake bitching about the 529's and her not getting anything as an offset.
My sister has complained about exactly this several times. She asks me how much they have contributed to their 529s and I truly have no idea since they opened the accounts.
This is a legitimate complaint. My parents put into a trust whatever they gift to my sisters kids, the same amount to me. Well rather, this trust. The beneficiary is any children I may have, but I don’t have kids yet. If at age 50 I still have no kids, I become the beneficiary.
I am the youngest cousin and I got kind of screwed inheritance wise because my grandparents gifted the maximum to each grandchild each year. Well that’s nice and all, but I have cousins who are 20 years older than me and I was only five when my grandparents died. So they inherited a lot more than I did. There was no equalization provision in their will, Which could’ve solved this issue. So my parents want to make sure this doesn’t happen again. Because then not only what I inherit was for my grandparents, then my siblings and daughter cousins did, I would also then inherit less from my parents
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to keep the house and she does not, of course she will buy her out at half of the fair market value. It would have tax consequences for her if she did not do this. She would be giving you a gift. So let’s say half of the fair market value is 100,000. If you only give her 50,000, then she is gifting you $50,000 essentially. And she would have to pay 40% gift tax on that. So yes, you should pay her fair market value. Furthermore, it is very typical of estate attorneys to recommend that parents gift equally among their kids. What if your sister has kids later? Or even if she doesn’t it’s Moreno fair to leave her the same amount. In my family, money if left equally in trust to each child. Each child is allowed a testamentary limited power of appointment in which they can write a will leaving their portion of their trust to any of their parents’ descendants. So I don’t have kids, but I’m only allowed to leave my inheritance to my brothers’ kids. Given the fact that I am super frugal and he and his wife spend spend spend, their kids will probably inherit more from me than from them.
This is not true. OP, I’m assuming you’re smart enough to not take tax advice from random on the internet?
Why isn’t it true? Yes it is. You aren’t allowed to just give money away, or give away the value of a house. If you do so, you have to pay gift tax or use lifetime exemption unless it is under 15k a year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want to keep the house and she does not, of course she will buy her out at half of the fair market value. It would have tax consequences for her if she did not do this. She would be giving you a gift. So let’s say half of the fair market value is 100,000. If you only give her 50,000, then she is gifting you $50,000 essentially. And she would have to pay 40% gift tax on that. So yes, you should pay her fair market value. Furthermore, it is very typical of estate attorneys to recommend that parents gift equally among their kids. What if your sister has kids later? Or even if she doesn’t it’s Moreno fair to leave her the same amount. In my family, money if left equally in trust to each child. Each child is allowed a testamentary limited power of appointment in which they can write a will leaving their portion of their trust to any of their parents’ descendants. So I don’t have kids, but I’m only allowed to leave my inheritance to my brothers’ kids. Given the fact that I am super frugal and he and his wife spend spend spend, their kids will probably inherit more from me than from them.
This is not true. OP, I’m assuming you’re smart enough to not take tax advice from random on the internet?
Anonymous wrote:If you want to keep the house and she does not, of course she will buy her out at half of the fair market value. It would have tax consequences for her if she did not do this. She would be giving you a gift. So let’s say half of the fair market value is 100,000. If you only give her 50,000, then she is gifting you $50,000 essentially. And she would have to pay 40% gift tax on that. So yes, you should pay her fair market value. Furthermore, it is very typical of estate attorneys to recommend that parents gift equally among their kids. What if your sister has kids later? Or even if she doesn’t it’s Moreno fair to leave her the same amount. In my family, money if left equally in trust to each child. Each child is allowed a testamentary limited power of appointment in which they can write a will leaving their portion of their trust to any of their parents’ descendants. So I don’t have kids, but I’m only allowed to leave my inheritance to my brothers’ kids. Given the fact that I am super frugal and he and his wife spend spend spend, their kids will probably inherit more from me than from them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am confused. Do you think your sister should just give you her portion of the house? Of course you should pay fair market value
Yes of course I would buy her out at fair market value if we kept the house... however her version of FMV is not going to be what the appraisal comes in at, knowing her she will think we can get more if we were to actually sell it vs. just what it’s worth.