Anonymous wrote:OP here. Saying nothing was my instinct, as well, once I figured out what the photo was but a more conservative friend was advising otherwise so wanted to get a larger opinion... I mean, I sure don't want to see that ugly naked photo but it pops up on practically every site right now!
Anonymous wrote:lol - oh, man. Poor teacher. He definitely learned his lesson about screening what you want to show to students before class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's an ad on wapo it's probably pretty innocent. If you came upon this ad while at work what would you think of someone going to HR over it? And I hope you don't use DCUM at work because here you go:
![]()
I don't get how we can look at women in lingerie every day but consider a somewhat undressed man to be the height of offense.
This is hilarious!
Thanks for making me laugh, I needed it this morning.
Anonymous wrote:If it's an ad on wapo it's probably pretty innocent. If you came upon this ad while at work what would you think of someone going to HR over it? And I hope you don't use DCUM at work because here you go:
![]()
I don't get how we can look at women in lingerie every day but consider a somewhat undressed man to be the height of offense.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like teacher handled it well. And modeled good digital citizenship - see something weird and uncomfortable, then get out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good lord, people are so judgmental. It was a question, "What would you do?"
Have you been in this exact situation before and known exactly what to do?
I haven't been in this exact situation, but I would know exactly what to do in this case: nothing. Because how dumb and wrong would I be to judge a teacher for an accident?
Anonymous wrote:Good lord, people are so judgmental. It was a question, "What would you do?"
Have you been in this exact situation before and known exactly what to do?
Anonymous wrote:Good lord, people are so judgmental. It was a question, "What would you do?"
Have you been in this exact situation before and known exactly what to do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it's an ad on wapo it's probably pretty innocent. If you came upon this ad while at work what would you think of someone going to HR over it? And I hope you don't use DCUM at work because here you go:
![]()
I don't get how we can look at women in lingerie every day but consider a somewhat undressed man to be the height of offense.
I don't like to see women objectified. And I don't want to see that man with a sling around his parts either.