Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I for one think it’s hilarious that our APs might actually have to work. 85% of their days in a building involve managing kid behavior or supervising lunch/recess. They’ve not had anything substantive to do for months.
They are still doing that work. It just looks different - chasing down kids who aren't attending class, calling parents, managing student problems. You seem really callous to the actual issues of secondary students.
Anonymous wrote:I for one think it’s hilarious that our APs might actually have to work. 85% of their days in a building involve managing kid behavior or supervising lunch/recess. They’ve not had anything substantive to do for months.
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes parents, you get what you ask for.
You said ES teachers were replaceable. You said it was a ‘child abuse’ to keep kids at home. You said teachers should come in our quit. So we did.
One day- you’ll learn. That working WITH teachers actually benefits your kids. Youll understand that identifying barriers to what you want and helping find splitting is better than threatening to move and making your kids ‘fully the schools’ responsibility.
And until then- have an awesome time in November. Pride comes before the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes parents, you get what you ask for.
You said ES teachers were replaceable. You said it was a ‘child abuse’ to keep kids at home. You said teachers should come in our quit. So we did.
One day- you’ll learn. That working WITH teachers actually benefits your kids. Youll understand that identifying barriers to what you want and helping find splitting is better than threatening to move and making your kids ‘fully the schools’ responsibility.
And until then- have an awesome time in November. Pride comes before the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Oh, you’ll also learn that you need to stand up up the LOUD pre-K moms. They have literally made it worse for everyone. Online classes will be larger, MS and HS are losing staff all due non compulsory education.
One day....
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't say anywhere that they will be non-teaching staff. In fact, in the article, it says this:
The plan would take staff members — including assistant principals, secretaries and counselors — away from their work for middle and high schools and place them in non-teaching roles supervising children in elementary schools.
Note that the interpretation of what it means to be a staff member is Stein's...not wording from the policy. And the adendum says "including" not "limited to". As in, TEACHERS too...who are staff members.
Additionally, later in the article, it says:
Jackson said principals have been asked to select the staff members who will be dispatched to CARE classrooms.
So which is it, principals are picking or it's non-teaching staff? There are only so many secretaries and counselors per school