Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct. And if you are so concerned about things keep your kids home forever but let us move on with our lives and having kids be kids.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
No. Indoor maskless sports will have to stop.
I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
+1. People can make their own decisions about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct. And if you are so concerned about things keep your kids home forever but let us move on with our lives and having kids be kids.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
No. Indoor maskless sports will have to stop.
I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
Anonymous wrote:What is troubling about this to me, as a hockey parent, is that people on the other team tested positive. So transmission cannot be fully explained away by time in the locker room (locker rooms aren’t open in our area rinks); exposure must have come through on ice play.
Our team wears masks during practice for the most part, but other teams aren’t wearing them in games.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, let's take a look at the NH case. 117 people were contact traced but not confirmed positive tests amongst 23 organizations. That's about 5 per org of just contact traced. Another 50 or so have something to do with hockey, hmmm that seems concrete. So it's about 7 people per hockey org contact traced to a maybe positive test.
Let's try it this way. 4692 people tested yesterday with 77 new cases. According to studies published in the Lancet, this would indicate most of those cases are either false positive or currently positive patients re-testing.
Much like the Maine hockey story which fizzled out, we will keep our eye on NH's numbers and see if this is real or not.
what?
Anonymous wrote:This is straight up fear mongering. No wonder why people dont want to do anything. 99.99% of the time your statement is simply not true and since covid has been around only a few months how do you know it's "life long" issues?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't read where anybody was hospitalized or ill beyond mild symptoms.
Mild symptoms can lead to life long issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct. And if you are so concerned about things keep your kids home forever but let us move on with our lives and having kids be kids.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
No. Indoor maskless sports will have to stop.
Anonymous wrote:Correct. And if you are so concerned about things keep your kids home forever but let us move on with our lives and having kids be kids.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, let's take a look at the NH case. 117 people were contact traced but not confirmed positive tests amongst 23 organizations. That's about 5 per org of just contact traced. Another 50 or so have something to do with hockey, hmmm that seems concrete. So it's about 7 people per hockey org contact traced to a maybe positive test.
Let's try it this way. 4692 people tested yesterday with 77 new cases. According to studies published in the Lancet, this would indicate most of those cases are either false positive or currently positive patients re-testing.
Much like the Maine hockey story which fizzled out, we will keep our eye on NH's numbers and see if this is real or not.
Anonymous wrote:There are potential super spreader events happening everywhere for sports. Soccer, baseball, football, lacrosse, swimming, etc. Just going to the grocery store has potential. I’m not sure why hockey has become such a hot topic on this board- it’s really not a major outlier. I have no dog in this fight, if you want to play great, have a fun season. If you’re uncomfortable about it, take the season off. THe obsession over this, as it relates to hockey, is really weird.
Anonymous wrote:I didn't read where anybody was hospitalized or ill beyond mild symptoms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't read where anybody was hospitalized or ill beyond mild symptoms.
Mild symptoms can lead to life long issues.
Anonymous wrote:The point is the sport is still played the same way with contact regardless if it’s June or November.