Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they hold tryouts? Did only the best of the best make it or where some of the picks political and not the best? That makes a difference for the legitimacy of both the Nike National and UA All-American games. If you claim to be the best of the best, then you actually should be.

You have no idea how things work if you think Under Armour holds legitimate tryouts.

I believe that is the point being made. Thank You!

Anonymous wrote:Did they hold tryouts? Did only the best of the best make it or where some of the picks political and not the best? That makes a difference for the legitimacy of both the Nike National and UA All-American games. If you claim to be the best of the best, then you actually should be.

You have no idea how things work if you think Under Armour holds legitimate tryouts.

Did they hold tryouts? Did only the best of the best make it or where some of the picks political and not the best? That makes a difference for the legitimacy of both the Nike National and UA All-American games. If you claim to be the best of the best, then you actually should be.

I don't see why anyone is trying to criticize the event, money grab or not.

Current seniors and current juniors need to play, PERIOD.

As much as I am hoping for a HS sports season this Spring, Covid is a very fluid situation.

I'm sure every Regional Team represented at the Nike event was missing some top players however I suspect 66% of the rosters were filled their regions top guys. These events are never flawless, and there will always be politics. You are naive to think the UA games aren't political.

Hopefully the Nike event can continue to grow and act as a good alternative to the UA games.

All in all, you can't argue, great showing by the DC teams in general.