Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh as long as they don't water down the curriculum any further I don't care
It can't get any more watered down than it is. As of two years ago, teachers are only required to execute one AA activity per quarter. Not one each subject per quarter - one activity for the WHOLE quarter. Of course, some teachers do more, but that is the minimum requirement.
What is AA?
Anonymous wrote:AAP is essentially a normal class minus the disruptive kids.
Anonymous wrote:AAP is essentially a normal class minus the disruptive kids.
Anonymous wrote:AAP is essentially a normal class minus the disruptive kids.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not a TJ forum. Also AAP still exists. Our local base school still doesn’t offer adv math until 5th grade so local level iv looks a long way off from where I sit and we will still hope for AAP at center for our youngest child (older kids already in).
AAP will soon face the same fate as TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP is going to be watered down. I mean every school is now going to be center school. Everyone can get into AAP.
No purpose of TJ , as it is going to be diluted with lottery selection on not best of the best.
So, is there a place for this forum in future ?
AAP has been watered down by the county for the past 5 to 10 years. And it will just continue to be watered down. AAP is the new Gen Ed. I taught general education for years. I'm using the same material that I used 15 years ago in general education for my current AA students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NP. I've heard anecdotally that the AAP/GT program of 10-20 years ago was brutal. Much more work in class and hours of nightly homework. Not so much better or a higher level as just more work.
We're at one of the "middle" centers, not one of the most watered down centers or one of the highest level/most competitive ones. It seems like a good program for DC, who is an "average gifted" student, not a prodigy nor a kid who thrives on hours of homework.
What the heck is an "average gifted student?" If your kid is gifted at all, he would be at the top in his AAP class. If he's an average AAP student, then he's probably around a 120 IQ and is bright but nowhere near gifted.
Also, to the PP who said that AAP is intended to be one year advanced math and nothing more: That's available for most gen ed students. Every school could easily offer advanced math starting in 3rd, so what's the point of a separate AAP program then?
Anonymous wrote:
NP. I've heard anecdotally that the AAP/GT program of 10-20 years ago was brutal. Much more work in class and hours of nightly homework. Not so much better or a higher level as just more work.
We're at one of the "middle" centers, not one of the most watered down centers or one of the highest level/most competitive ones. It seems like a good program for DC, who is an "average gifted" student, not a prodigy nor a kid who thrives on hours of homework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP is going to be watered down. I mean every school is now going to be center school. Everyone can get into AAP.
No purpose of TJ , as it is going to be diluted with lottery selection on not best of the best.
So, is there a place for this forum in future ?
AAP has been watered down by the county for the past 5 to 10 years. And it will just continue to be watered down. AAP is the new Gen Ed. I taught general education for years. I'm using the same material that I used 15 years ago in general education for my current AA students.
This is simply not true. For English and social studies, fine. Nobody said that intelligent people develop language faster or understand history better ("wow, they learned about the civil war REAL GOOD!" lol). It's mostly about math. I was in a top private school 30 years ago that is very respected for its math and science. My son is doing the same math in AAP that I was doing in the advanced math class at that school. AAP is basically one year ahead math work. That's what it was designed to be and that's what it still is.
NP. I've heard anecdotally that the AAP/GT program of 10-20 years ago was brutal. Much more work in class and hours of nightly homework. Not so much better or a higher level as just more work.
We're at one of the "middle" centers, not one of the most watered down centers or one of the highest level/most competitive ones. It seems like a good program for DC, who is an "average gifted" student, not a prodigy nor a kid who thrives on hours of homework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP is going to be watered down. I mean every school is now going to be center school. Everyone can get into AAP.
No purpose of TJ , as it is going to be diluted with lottery selection on not best of the best.
So, is there a place for this forum in future ?
AAP has been watered down by the county for the past 5 to 10 years. And it will just continue to be watered down. AAP is the new Gen Ed. I taught general education for years. I'm using the same material that I used 15 years ago in general education for my current AA students.
This is simply not true. For English and social studies, fine. Nobody said that intelligent people develop language faster or understand history better ("wow, they learned about the civil war REAL GOOD!" lol). It's mostly about math. I was in a top private school 30 years ago that is very respected for its math and science. My son is doing the same math in AAP that I was doing in the advanced math class at that school. AAP is basically one year ahead math work. That's what it was designed to be and that's what it still is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP is going to be watered down. I mean every school is now going to be center school. Everyone can get into AAP.
No purpose of TJ , as it is going to be diluted with lottery selection on not best of the best.
So, is there a place for this forum in future ?
AAP has been watered down by the county for the past 5 to 10 years. And it will just continue to be watered down. AAP is the new Gen Ed. I taught general education for years. I'm using the same material that I used 15 years ago in general education for my current AA students.
Anonymous wrote:Exactly, if everyone can get into AAP and TJ is lottery, what is the purpose of this forum ? How else can parents motivate their children to compete in academics ?
Anonymous wrote:Exactly, if everyone can get into AAP and TJ is lottery, what is the purpose of this forum ? How else can parents motivate their children to compete in academics ?