Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
![]()
![]()
Not sure whether to laugh or cry. It's lazy to give your children independence?
It is really not healthy to sit and supervise an 11 year old's play time, unless there are developmental issues. Cut the cord lady!
My 11 year old isn't going out to the yard and playing. You are lazy if yours is and isn't in activities. Its not healthy to ignore your 11 year old, not spend time with them and not allow them to pursue their interests as you have to put money and effort into it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
![]()
![]()
Not sure whether to laugh or cry. It's lazy to give your children independence?
It is really not healthy to sit and supervise an 11 year old's play time, unless there are developmental issues. Cut the cord lady!
My 11 year old isn't going out to the yard and playing. You are lazy if yours is and isn't in activities. Its not healthy to ignore your 11 year old, not spend time with them and not allow them to pursue their interests as you have to put money and effort into it.
Anonymous wrote:I would love to live in a neighborhood that people did this. We don’t have sidewalks, though, so kids need to be old enough to have good judgement about walking in the street, which is probably closer to middle elementary age.
We let our 4 and 6 year old roam our own property (2/3 acre so not huge) unsupervised but together. It’s not fenced in, but we are really set back from the road, so don’t have any worries about traffic. If friends come over, we also let them roam around outside. In a couple of years will probably let them walk to the nearby park together.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
![]()
![]()
Not sure whether to laugh or cry. It's lazy to give your children independence?
It is really not healthy to sit and supervise an 11 year old's play time, unless there are developmental issues. Cut the cord lady!
Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
Lazy or not helicopter parents?!?
Anonymous wrote:how did all of you find these kid filled cul de sacs? I grew up in one with lots of boys my brother's ages, but I was sooo lonely I couldn't wait to get out. I'm tempted to try a cul de sac for my kids, but I know the risks now. I almost want to knock on doors and get a census of genders, energy levels, and ages haha.
Anonymous wrote:I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm amazed at how lazy people are. At 11, we are still loosely supervising and wouldn't let ours go off on their own.
Seriously? I feel like an 11 year old who is never let outside of mommy’s sight is a kid who is going to grow up anxious and second guessing her every move. At least with my kids, and especially my oldest, who tended to be a worrier, giving freedom was a great way to help develop skills and self confidence.
My kids were freely roaming the neighborhood and walking to school with friends at 7/8. Walking up the street to a friends house (but not freely roaming) at 6. At 2 and 4 they’d sometimes play in the backyard alone with windows open, but I’d supervise in the front yard. At 9 and 11, they walk to get snacks at cvs and go fishing in a creek near us. I’m definitely more comfortable if they are together or with a friend.