Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This happened to my child. Had an asthma-like attack the other day while running for a sport with a mask. My child cannot continue to participate in said sport the same way as long as masks are required. My child cannot participate in some activities in practice and must take more frequent breaks.
But you need to look at this on the level of individual versus societal risk. The greater good is that risk of transmission in a community goes down.
What happened was downright scary for my child but I still think MSI's position is the right one.
Your child could definitely qualify for a medical exemption. I would talk to your pediatrician. I wouldn’t go for the greater good if it’s harming my child, sorry. My daughters are playing in very lightweight masks and have been fine so far. But if something like this happened I would not hesitate to get a medical exemption.
Anonymous wrote:MoCo is a buble.
Anonymous wrote:This happened to my child. Had an asthma-like attack the other day while running for a sport with a mask. My child cannot continue to participate in said sport the same way as long as masks are required. My child cannot participate in some activities in practice and must take more frequent breaks.
But you need to look at this on the level of individual versus societal risk. The greater good is that risk of transmission in a community goes down.
What happened was downright scary for my child but I still think MSI's position is the right one.
Anonymous wrote:This happened to my child. Had an asthma-like attack the other day while running for a sport with a mask. My child cannot continue to participate in said sport the same way as long as masks are required. My child cannot participate in some activities in practice and must take more frequent breaks.
But you need to look at this on the level of individual versus societal risk. The greater good is that risk of transmission in a community goes down.
What happened was downright scary for my child but I still think MSI's position is the right one.
Anonymous wrote:This happened to my child. Had an asthma-like attack the other day while running for a sport with a mask. My child cannot continue to participate in said sport the same way as long as masks are required. My child cannot participate in some activities in practice and must take more frequent breaks.
But you need to look at this on the level of individual versus societal risk. The greater good is that risk of transmission in a community goes down.
What happened was downright scary for my child but I still think MSI's position is the right one.
Anonymous wrote:Because numerous health experts say masks work and they want to minimize any risk of transmission. What kind of question is this?
Anonymous wrote:The mask requirement came about after many had already registered. So they wouldn't be changing mid season...they would just be going back to their original protocol when they started registering teams/players. The just got spooked by a few families/teams who threatened to pull out.
Anonymous wrote:OP is not complaining -- she's trying to stir up a debate about wearing masks so she can say how stupid she thinks they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - the comments here make sense regarding a change of policy mid season. I understand it. Thanks. To the comments about people being safe playing outside with masks on only - I was not referring to soccer in MoCo.....if you drive 20 minutes away everyone is playing soccer, lacrosse and everything else mask free outside.....I am all for being safe but those of you that think masks outside are a must are a bit extreme IMO. Thank you all for the comments re MSI. Makes sense!
OP I agree I think masks outside during soccer are overkill and have the potential to do more harm than good. That said, it's not the hill I am going to die on. Its more important to me for my kid to play with her friends and have a fun season that doesn't get disrupted by whipsawing policies than anything else. Because of Covid, soccer is not only her physical outlet but really her only social outlet as well. If she's working hard, learning and having fun, the rest is gravy in my mind for this year.
OP here again. Agree completely. We are so fortunate to have the opportunity to create a sense of normalcy with all of these extracurriculars that I will not be putting up a big stink about anything......but I do wish they could play without the masks![]()
If you wanted your DC to play without masks, then why did you sign her up to play for MSI in the first place? You could have had her join teams in other counties or in VA. So now, don’t complain because you already committed your DC to play with a mask.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - the comments here make sense regarding a change of policy mid season. I understand it. Thanks. To the comments about people being safe playing outside with masks on only - I was not referring to soccer in MoCo.....if you drive 20 minutes away everyone is playing soccer, lacrosse and everything else mask free outside.....I am all for being safe but those of you that think masks outside are a must are a bit extreme IMO. Thank you all for the comments re MSI. Makes sense!
OP I agree I think masks outside during soccer are overkill and have the potential to do more harm than good. That said, it's not the hill I am going to die on. Its more important to me for my kid to play with her friends and have a fun season that doesn't get disrupted by whipsawing policies than anything else. Because of Covid, soccer is not only her physical outlet but really her only social outlet as well. If she's working hard, learning and having fun, the rest is gravy in my mind for this year.
OP here again. Agree completely. We are so fortunate to have the opportunity to create a sense of normalcy with all of these extracurriculars that I will not be putting up a big stink about anything......but I do wish they could play without the masks![]()