Anonymous wrote:seems to mirror what the article is saying
Girls soccer isn't all white or all UMC, it's just disproportionally so - 25% on scholarship means 75% not and scholarships may or may not cover actual travel expenses and certainly don't free up parents to get kids to practices and games. My DD has never played on an all white team, but she's also never played on one (and rarely against one that is minority white or even close to it).It’s disproportionately white and upper-middle-class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US is mainly white. Did you know polo in China is dominated by Chinese people, and it can be further separated by economics and weather.
I hear soccer in South America is dominated by Latinos. Go figure.
In the US, all players are Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of valid points here, and rings true all over the DMV
https://sports.yahoo.com/the-privilege-of-play-why-the-worlds-game-is-a-white-game-in-the-us-150024228.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
I have to say this hasn't been my experience in Northern VA. I don't think my daughters ever played on a single team which was all white. Nor did the majority of the girls on the team attend private schools - in fact I can only remember three girls - in fifteen years - who did, although I may have forgotten one or two here and there. In general my daughters' teams had anywhere between one and three black girls on the roster - which is about proportionate.
For boys it's even less true with huge numbers of central and south american kids playing, especially at the higher levels of youth soccer. My son's team for example has three black kids, four hispanic kids, one asian kid, and nine or ten white kids.
And pretty much all soccer programs offer financial aid to kids who could not otherwise afford to play. In some cases this is 25% or more of the roster.
Girls soccer isn't all white or all UMC, it's just disproportionally so - 25% on scholarship means 75% not and scholarships may or may not cover actual travel expenses and certainly don't free up parents to get kids to practices and games. My DD has never played on an all white team, but she's also never played on one (and rarely against one that is minority white or even close to it).It’s disproportionately white and upper-middle-class
Anonymous wrote:A lot of valid points here, and rings true all over the DMV
https://sports.yahoo.com/the-privilege-of-play-why-the-worlds-game-is-a-white-game-in-the-us-150024228.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
Anonymous wrote:Unless you are talking about college soccer - men's soccer 88% non-white - women's soccer 60% non-white
Just pull up a few rosters....see for yourself
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US is mainly white. Did you know polo in China is dominated by Chinese people, and it can be further separated by economics and weather.
The US is 1/2 white if that's what you mean by mostly.
Anonymous wrote:This is very true particularly for Girls Soccer. I see very few minorities. But when my DD played in an indoor soccer league at the Sportsplex in Rockville, she played against a couple of teams that had all Hispanic players. They were pretty good teams too. I don’t know if it’s the cost or they prefer to play for Hispanic coaches that focused on technical skills, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US is mainly white. Did you know polo in China is dominated by Chinese people, and it can be further separated by economics and weather.
The US is 1/2 white if that's what you mean by mostly.