Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of grocery order if you saw another family and stayed in a same house?
Eating out, meaning indoors and even outdoors seems like the riskiest thing to do, imo. So all good on that.
Why would taking one risk mean you should also take others? I would rather see another family than go grocery shopping, so just because I see the other family doesn't mean I am also obligated to engage in other risky activities. I mean, that's completely counterintuitive.
Imo grocery shopping with a mask on is less risky than seeing friends without masks on. And if you were in the same house, it is unlikely you all wore masks around each other. So, it is not comparable risk, one is a much higher risk than the other.
Schools cannot open until our children and their educators safety and concerns are adequately addressed. It's not some PPs fault schools aren't open. It's because of the virus. Part of the reason this has gone on for so long is the politicizing of this issue. If you know your SIL's kids have been sick with novovirus or rotovirus or chicken pox or whatever, you ain't sending your kids over there for a weekend sleepover right?Anonymous wrote:You are why we cannot open schools. Enjoy your life but don't complain about why schools aren't open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the point of grocery order if you saw another family and stayed in a same house?
Eating out, meaning indoors and even outdoors seems like the riskiest thing to do, imo. So all good on that.
Why would taking one risk mean you should also take others? I would rather see another family than go grocery shopping, so just because I see the other family doesn't mean I am also obligated to engage in other risky activities. I mean, that's completely counterintuitive.
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of grocery order if you saw another family and stayed in a same house?
Eating out, meaning indoors and even outdoors seems like the riskiest thing to do, imo. So all good on that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Back in March, we did not leave our house and immediate street.
In April, we got groceries delivered, went hiking and saw no one.
Around Memorial Day, we rented a beach house with a heated pool. Still got groceries delivered and avoided all people.
In June, kids started going to tennis clinic outdoors. My parents visited us from NY.
In July, we went to our friend’s beach house and hung out with them.
In August, we rented a beach house with one other family. My kids started having soccer practice. I hosted 2 backyard play dates and attended 1 outdoor play date.
We still get our groceries delivered and don’t eat out.
Is this normal? I feel like I am taking too much risk.
What risks have you taken?
Most people are taking a lot more risks. I think you are perfectly fine.
Anonymous wrote:I thought this was interesting:
https://www.latimes.com/sports/story/2020-08-12/column-bill-plaschke-covid-19-experience?utm_source=pocket-newtab
He got it from a socially distanced outdoors lunch, without masks. Honestly I am not comfortable doing outdoors/distanced get togethers without masks at this time. I agree with PP about not doing kid's sports. I know some kids who still have taste/smell damage (neurological) months later.
But you have to gauge your own comfort level. Everything is risk mitigation, so even taking less risks along the continuum even if you don't totally eliminate risk will help you not to be too exposed. The thing that keeps me in check is knowing how badly the situation here has been managed on a national scale. Background transmission is not under control, and there are real issues with testing. Many people are pretending there is no pandemic. If I were in another country, I might behave differently.