Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
NP
I think that’s a big barrier. Nobody has taken the lead here (I’m in NoVA) to set that metric. Everyone is looking to somebody else to set it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.
The NY teacher union might be the strongest in the country. If there was a public health angle out of this, they would use it.
There isn't that angle. Because New Yorkers and their government have actually managed this thing.
Anonymous wrote:NYC schools are opening, but for elementary public it's only 2 -4 days in person per two week period. And for middle and high schools it's even less. So still an extremely limited hybrid system.
Anonymous wrote:Many teachers have children who are in different school districts. School districts that are going all virtual. So to expect the teachers to come in to work while most of the neighboring school districts are going virtual - that puts a pretty great burden on these teachers. I'm not against reopening, I'm just pointing out that you do need to consider what your neighboring school districts are also doing for many reasons - including this one.
I would imagine that would be relatively uncommon in a district as large as NYC. However, I could see if being more of an issue in other parts of the state.
It is a challenge in much of NYS. My children were first in MCPS, then we bought in FCPS. When we moved up to NY I was stunned that districts were so small. Each town might have its own school district. Many band together across a region as part of a BOCES district with a shared calendar—but that is all out the window now. My district is hybrid either MT or ThF, the neighboring district is MW/TTh hybrid, and my boyfriend’s kids go 3days on, 3 days off. So many teachers teach out of district. Coordinate childcare is going to be difficult for ALL working parents.
I would imagine that would be relatively uncommon in a district as large as NYC. However, I could see if being more of an issue in other parts of the state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
Anonymous wrote:Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.
I wouldn't assume that. I know NY teachers who are really upset about the schools reopening. But they are afraid to speak out.
Of course there will be some who are upset. My friend is a teacher in NYC. She wants to go back in person, primarily because it was impossible for her to try to teach virtually out of her tiny apartment with her two little kids there. Other teachers may have different concerns, of course. There is no solution that will work for every single teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
NP
I think that’s a big barrier. Nobody has taken the lead here (I’m in NoVA) to set that metric. Everyone is looking to somebody else to set it.
I think the FCPS Superintendent said the district plans to release re-opening metrics by 8/15? Anyone else see that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
DP.. what's the 7 day rolling average? Is nova/VA seeing cases go up even as the rate is below 5%? Then that's a concern. NY's rate is flat or going down. That's why they feel it's ok to re-open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
DP.. what's the 7 day rolling average? Is nova/VA seeing cases go up even as the rate is below 5%? Then that's a concern. NY's rate is flat or going down. That's why they feel it's ok to re-open.