Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the context of other reopening activities, not well (C-). If schools can't open, the administration needs to demonstrate they are serious about getting us to the point where schools can open (e.g., stop all indoor dining).
Outdoor pools are closed but you can go to church with 70 friends and grab a bite to eat being served by a waiter that's been in close contact with fellow waitstaff all day.
Things need to make more sense and priorities need to be clearer.
I agree. The priorities are not clear. I think they should have prioritized a return to school, even hybrid, which would mean shutting down indoor dining, bars, gyms, and larger gatherings to reduce community spread. It also would have meant stockpiling PPE, tests, and other necessary supplies for schools, and creating a real plan for how school would work and how schools would deal with COVID cases among students and staff.
Everyone is winging it, I get that, and I think that DC government has done a decent job of listening to scientists and public health experts, but the decisions being made now don't make a lot of sense to me.
Anonymous wrote:She's no worse than any other local politician. In fact she's fine. Trying to manage what she has to deal with. What's the problem? She also has the misfortune of not being in a state.
Anonymous wrote:F
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the context of other reopening activities, not well (C-). If schools can't open, the administration needs to demonstrate they are serious about getting us to the point where schools can open (e.g., stop all indoor dining).
Outdoor pools are closed but you can go to church with 70 friends and grab a bite to eat being served by a waiter that's been in close contact with fellow waitstaff all day.
Things need to make more sense and priorities need to be clearer.
I agree. The priorities are not clear. I think they should have prioritized a return to school, even hybrid, which would mean shutting down indoor dining, bars, gyms, and larger gatherings to reduce community spread. It also would have meant stockpiling PPE, tests, and other necessary supplies for schools, and creating a real plan for how school would work and how schools would deal with COVID cases among students and staff.
Everyone is winging it, I get that, and I think that DC government has done a decent job of listening to scientists and public health experts, but the decisions being made now don't make a lot of sense to me.
Yeah, prioritizing returning to this sounds like a major win![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree that she was doing well early on, but blew it with re-opening things that were NOT school. And now that we know schools will remain close, she STILL hasn't rolled back indoor dining, etc. It's extremely frustrating.
Why should she? D.C. numbers are trending downward with no spikes in cases. I read that only 13 ICU beds in the city were in use last week.
Meanwhile should she open schools to the 50,000 students there is absolutely no way to stop the spread of COVID-19.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that she was doing well early on, but blew it with re-opening things that were NOT school. And now that we know schools will remain close, she STILL hasn't rolled back indoor dining, etc. It's extremely frustrating.
Anonymous wrote:Here is what I would have wanted:
A statement that given # of new cases is X, this is what we are doing. That as long as __(insert metric here)__ is above /below INSERT TARGET HERE, this is what we are doing.
That once schools open, it will be school based metrics so that communities can respond to their needs. If there is a positive case at a school, this is the protocols .........
I need a rules based statement from our leaders - and have not seen anything