Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your son is a talented athlete, football and basketball are the way to go. Full ride. The run of the mill white kid generally will not be successful there, however...thus the proliferation of lacrosse.
You and PP above you are complete idiots. This thread is about GIRLS LACROSSE. Read the title (hint - IWLCA is governing body of women’s lacrosse coaches).
*1
Start your own thread rather than taking over ours.
Fair enough, but let’s be honest while we’re all anonymous - none of these second tier sports exist at major college level without football. Reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your son is a talented athlete, football and basketball are the way to go. Full ride. The run of the mill white kid generally will not be successful there, however...thus the proliferation of lacrosse.
You and PP above you are complete idiots. This thread is about GIRLS LACROSSE. Read the title (hint - IWLCA is governing body of women’s lacrosse coaches).
*1
Start your own thread rather than taking over ours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your son is a talented athlete, football and basketball are the way to go. Full ride. The run of the mill white kid generally will not be successful there, however...thus the proliferation of lacrosse.
You and PP above you are complete idiots. This thread is about GIRLS LACROSSE. Read the title (hint - IWLCA is governing body of women’s lacrosse coaches).
Anonymous wrote:If your son is a talented athlete, football and basketball are the way to go. Full ride. The run of the mill white kid generally will not be successful there, however...thus the proliferation of lacrosse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the risk of sounding naive, I don’t think this is about camp money. Coaches are genuinely concerned about not seeing players in person. Reluctant to recruit on tape. Want to see interaction with teammates, coaches, officials. How they move and position themselves without the ball, which you often can’t see when the film is only following the ball. How they communicate on the field and sideline. How kids carry themselves before and after games. How they interact with their parent(s). Stuff you just can’t see on film. Plus the fact that they don’t know what their rosters are going to look like in 2021 or 2022. These are four year commitments often with scholarship money behind them. I don’t think anyone coaches Women’s lacrosse for the Big payday.
You are very naive. A few points:
1) Lacrosse commits rarely get scholarships so that’s not in play here.
2) Coaches can continue to watch the 2022s even if date stays Sept 1st
3) The Sept 1 date doesn’t force them to commit anyone if they aren’t ready
4) All the Sept 1 date does is allow full contact so girls can find out who is interested in them.
5) Coaches don’t get paid much, indeed that is the point. They make their money through camps. Why do you think so many of them create companies for camps.
Anonymous wrote:At the risk of sounding naive, I don’t think this is about camp money. Coaches are genuinely concerned about not seeing players in person. Reluctant to recruit on tape. Want to see interaction with teammates, coaches, officials. How they move and position themselves without the ball, which you often can’t see when the film is only following the ball. How they communicate on the field and sideline. How kids carry themselves before and after games. How they interact with their parent(s). Stuff you just can’t see on film. Plus the fact that they don’t know what their rosters are going to look like in 2021 or 2022. These are four year commitments often with scholarship money behind them. I don’t think anyone coaches Women’s lacrosse for the Big payday.