Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Outdoor school would not need to mimic indoor school. Best for elementary school ages, when so much learning is experiential. I think it would be harder for, say, calculus. They don't need desks or chalkboards necessarily. But they do need innovative administrators and educators.
How do you suggest they do stations, work with math manipulatives, color or do art activities, have enough reading books all at different levels outdoors for 25 kids?
So what, the kids are going to learn how to do math problems in their heads without writing down groupings or using blocks? They are going to learn spelling by putting words together in their head? Of course they are going to need a desk. Along those lines, how do you expect them to learn to write letters, words, or sentences? Juggling a notebook while sitting in the grass? Great form and example there.
Not going to work without the typical accessories and things needed for learning. So let’s bring out a million things outside for hundreds of kids and have it sitting in the grass and mud. Then lug it back in again.
Do you even have an elementary age child?
NP. My four-year-old is not going to be learning much math or spelling via the iPAD while my husband and I desperately try to do our jobs. DL was largely fictional in the spring for him and it's going to be fictional in the fall, no matter how hard his school tries (and they are legitimately trying very hard), because he is not developmentally ready for it. Sitting on the grass alternating being read to, running around, being taught by a teacher writing on a portable whiteboard-- all of these would be a better experience for him than what's currently planned, because they would be in-person. Obviously it would not be the same as in-classroom school. But that's not the alternative here. The alternative is that we all pretend that DL school is school, like if I close my eyes and wish really hard it'll be the case that these kids aren't about to miss out on another year of education.
Your kid is 4 and schooling is not mandatory. Get over yourself. Parents of kids who are older have legitimate concerns. People whose kids are in PreK are just complaining. Put your kid in daycare.
THIS. The ECE parents just need to stop with the complaint and whining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Outdoor school would not need to mimic indoor school. Best for elementary school ages, when so much learning is experiential. I think it would be harder for, say, calculus. They don't need desks or chalkboards necessarily. But they do need innovative administrators and educators.
How do you suggest they do stations, work with math manipulatives, color or do art activities, have enough reading books all at different levels outdoors for 25 kids?
So what, the kids are going to learn how to do math problems in their heads without writing down groupings or using blocks? They are going to learn spelling by putting words together in their head? Of course they are going to need a desk. Along those lines, how do you expect them to learn to write letters, words, or sentences? Juggling a notebook while sitting in the grass? Great form and example there.
Not going to work without the typical accessories and things needed for learning. So let’s bring out a million things outside for hundreds of kids and have it sitting in the grass and mud. Then lug it back in again.
Do you even have an elementary age child?
NP. My four-year-old is not going to be learning much math or spelling via the iPAD while my husband and I desperately try to do our jobs. DL was largely fictional in the spring for him and it's going to be fictional in the fall, no matter how hard his school tries (and they are legitimately trying very hard), because he is not developmentally ready for it. Sitting on the grass alternating being read to, running around, being taught by a teacher writing on a portable whiteboard-- all of these would be a better experience for him than what's currently planned, because they would be in-person. Obviously it would not be the same as in-classroom school. But that's not the alternative here. The alternative is that we all pretend that DL school is school, like if I close my eyes and wish really hard it'll be the case that these kids aren't about to miss out on another year of education.
Your kid is 4 and schooling is not mandatory. Get over yourself. Parents of kids who are older have legitimate concerns. People whose kids are in PreK are just complaining. Put your kid in daycare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Outdoor school would not need to mimic indoor school. Best for elementary school ages, when so much learning is experiential. I think it would be harder for, say, calculus. They don't need desks or chalkboards necessarily. But they do need innovative administrators and educators.
How do you suggest they do stations, work with math manipulatives, color or do art activities, have enough reading books all at different levels outdoors for 25 kids?
So what, the kids are going to learn how to do math problems in their heads without writing down groupings or using blocks? They are going to learn spelling by putting words together in their head? Of course they are going to need a desk. Along those lines, how do you expect them to learn to write letters, words, or sentences? Juggling a notebook while sitting in the grass? Great form and example there.
Not going to work without the typical accessories and things needed for learning. So let’s bring out a million things outside for hundreds of kids and have it sitting in the grass and mud. Then lug it back in again.
Do you even have an elementary age child?
NP. My four-year-old is not going to be learning much math or spelling via the iPAD while my husband and I desperately try to do our jobs. DL was largely fictional in the spring for him and it's going to be fictional in the fall, no matter how hard his school tries (and they are legitimately trying very hard), because he is not developmentally ready for it. Sitting on the grass alternating being read to, running around, being taught by a teacher writing on a portable whiteboard-- all of these would be a better experience for him than what's currently planned, because they would be in-person. Obviously it would not be the same as in-classroom school. But that's not the alternative here. The alternative is that we all pretend that DL school is school, like if I close my eyes and wish really hard it'll be the case that these kids aren't about to miss out on another year of education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Outdoor school would not need to mimic indoor school. Best for elementary school ages, when so much learning is experiential. I think it would be harder for, say, calculus. They don't need desks or chalkboards necessarily. But they do need innovative administrators and educators.
How do you suggest they do stations, work with math manipulatives, color or do art activities, have enough reading books all at different levels outdoors for 25 kids?
So what, the kids are going to learn how to do math problems in their heads without writing down groupings or using blocks? They are going to learn spelling by putting words together in their head? Of course they are going to need a desk. Along those lines, how do you expect them to learn to write letters, words, or sentences? Juggling a notebook while sitting in the grass? Great form and example there.
Not going to work without the typical accessories and things needed for learning. So let’s bring out a million things outside for hundreds of kids and have it sitting in the grass and mud. Then lug it back in again.
Do you even have an elementary age child?
Anonymous wrote:Outdoor school would not need to mimic indoor school. Best for elementary school ages, when so much learning is experiential. I think it would be harder for, say, calculus. They don't need desks or chalkboards necessarily. But they do need innovative administrators and educators.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Switch to your in-boundary DCPS school then. Plenty of others waiting to take your spot.
This kind of response is exactly why we actually need education. Open your mind. Think about what different education models were created to do and if you think they are actually doing them. Strive for something better for all our kids.
It happens to be true that my kids' spots would be snapped up but you have no idea where they go to school nor our in bounds. Knee jerk snark will serve none of us.
Anonymous wrote:
Switch to your in-boundary DCPS school then. Plenty of others waiting to take your spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a charter school that had previously announced its intention to host students for a hybrid model. Are other folks at charters anticipating that their schools will follow the DCPS decision for 100% DL? I have a feeling the answer is yes....
The charters typically take their cues from DCPS on things like this so expect most if not all to follow the guidelines announced this morning.
It's too bad. This is when autonomy and the ability to be creative (e.g., outdoor class) might really matter.
Why are parents so insistent on outdoor classrooms being the answer? Many of our schools don’t have extensive outdoor space. In addition, they need to have indoor space as a backup for weather so outdoor classrooms don’t actually solve anything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/nyregion/coronavirus-nyc-schools-reopening-outdoors.html
Yes, this will not work for or help Sela. But, LAMB? They were perfectly positioned to build covered outdoors spaces. Others as well. Waldorf schools make outdoors work. If a school wanted to, was creative, and able to raise funds, it would solve quite a bit actually.
The point is that the primary reason to have charters is innovation and autonomy from a larger district's inability to be fast and flexible. But, what we're seeing is charters waiting and following the lead of DCPS. I've been a charter proponent for years but this is really making me question my own faith. Might as well just have DCPS develop dual language schools and no boundary schools and forget this false notion of independence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a charter school that had previously announced its intention to host students for a hybrid model. Are other folks at charters anticipating that their schools will follow the DCPS decision for 100% DL? I have a feeling the answer is yes....
The charters typically take their cues from DCPS on things like this so expect most if not all to follow the guidelines announced this morning.
It's too bad. This is when autonomy and the ability to be creative (e.g., outdoor class) might really matter.
Why are parents so insistent on outdoor classrooms being the answer? Many of our schools don’t have extensive outdoor space. In addition, they need to have indoor space as a backup for weather so outdoor classrooms don’t actually solve anything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/nyregion/coronavirus-nyc-schools-reopening-outdoors.html
Yes, this will not work for or help Sela. But, LAMB? They were perfectly positioned to build covered outdoors spaces. Others as well. Waldorf schools make outdoors work. If a school wanted to, was creative, and able to raise funds, it would solve quite a bit actually.
The point is that the primary reason to have charters is innovation and autonomy from a larger district's inability to be fast and flexible. But, what we're seeing is charters waiting and following the lead of DCPS. I've been a charter proponent for years but this is really making me question my own faith. Might as well just have DCPS develop dual language schools and no boundary schools and forget this false notion of independence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a charter school that had previously announced its intention to host students for a hybrid model. Are other folks at charters anticipating that their schools will follow the DCPS decision for 100% DL? I have a feeling the answer is yes....
The charters typically take their cues from DCPS on things like this so expect most if not all to follow the guidelines announced this morning.
It's too bad. This is when autonomy and the ability to be creative (e.g., outdoor class) might really matter.
Why are parents so insistent on outdoor classrooms being the answer? Many of our schools don’t have extensive outdoor space. In addition, they need to have indoor space as a backup for weather so outdoor classrooms don’t actually solve anything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/nyregion/coronavirus-nyc-schools-reopening-outdoors.html
Yes, this will not work for or help Sela. But, LAMB? They were perfectly positioned to build covered outdoors spaces. Others as well. Waldorf schools make outdoors work. If a school wanted to, was creative, and able to raise funds, it would solve quite a bit actually.
The point is that the primary reason to have charters is innovation and autonomy from a larger district's inability to be fast and flexible. But, what we're seeing is charters waiting and following the lead of DCPS. I've been a charter proponent for years but this is really making me question my own faith. Might as well just have DCPS develop dual language schools and no boundary schools and forget this false notion of independence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a charter school that had previously announced its intention to host students for a hybrid model. Are other folks at charters anticipating that their schools will follow the DCPS decision for 100% DL? I have a feeling the answer is yes....
The charters typically take their cues from DCPS on things like this so expect most if not all to follow the guidelines announced this morning.
It's too bad. This is when autonomy and the ability to be creative (e.g., outdoor class) might really matter.
Why are parents so insistent on outdoor classrooms being the answer? Many of our schools don’t have extensive outdoor space. In addition, they need to have indoor space as a backup for weather so outdoor classrooms don’t actually solve anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a charter school that had previously announced its intention to host students for a hybrid model. Are other folks at charters anticipating that their schools will follow the DCPS decision for 100% DL? I have a feeling the answer is yes....
The charters typically take their cues from DCPS on things like this so expect most if not all to follow the guidelines announced this morning.
It's too bad. This is when autonomy and the ability to be creative (e.g., outdoor class) might really matter.